Benefits or traps of a new law on companies

Over three months have passed since the law on companies came into force. Although sufficient practice has not yet been worked out, one can draw the first conclusions about the “work” of the law, about its advantages, which can sometimes turn into traps.

Advantages/trap № 1. How to control the shareholders and their share?

Narrowing the list of required information in the charter received an ambiguous assessment from the very beginning. Simplification, at first sight, the procedure of alienation may turn into significant risks for the whole company.

Since the information about the shareholders and the size of their shares are no longer required to be specified in the charter, in the case of transactions with the shares (their parts), changing of the charter is not necessary.

The procedure for registering changes does not require the convening of a general meeting, the applicant is the acquirer of the share or its alienator.

On the one hand, the simplification of the procedure protects the rights and interests of the person who has acquired a share in the company. But here is a problem in controlling the changes by the company. Theoretically, the company may not know that the share was alienated, and a new one appeared among the shareholders.

In order to avoid such a situation, the legislator introduced amendments to the law on state registration. In case of changes of the shareholders, the registrar or notary is obliged to send an excerpt to the company, the applicant and all members of the company – both those that were indicated in the register before the registration action and new ones.

Obviously, the motives of the legislator were the notification of all persons whose rights may be affected by the registration. However, there are some problems here. The law clearly provides for the submission of an excerpt, which does not contain information about the founders (shareholders). The only way this action can protect the rights of the shareholders – to become an indicator of making some changes to the registry and to force shareholders to check information. But only if this person is familiar with the law and knows about the legal requirement to send an excerpt.


Advantages/trap № 2. How does priority right work?

In the procedure of priority right, one should pay attention to one feature. Shareholders have a priority right to purchase a share (part thereof) that is sold to a third party. That is, it is enough to simply conclude a contract other than a sale-purchase contract (for example, barter or a gift). And you are free from the priority right.


Advantages/trap № 3. Withdrawal of shareholders having 50% or more.

Dividing the procedure of withdrawal for shareholders with less than 50% of the share capital (without consent) and those having 50% or more (only with the consent of other shareholders), obviously aimed at protecting minority owners from the withdrawal of most of the assets from a company. A shareholder with more than 50% actually controls the company, and therefore the possibility of its unhindered release will negatively affect the company as a whole.

But how to protect minority shareholders from such an exit, taken into account the possibility of blocking any decisions of a company by a shareholder who wants to withdraw? The shareholder does not get out, but the company does not make any decisions.

Such a “runaway” may use a different opportunity – to divide their share. Given that priority right applies only to cases of sale, one can give part of the share (for example, 40% of 80%) to some of the family members. After this, each of those having 40% can freely go out.

For minority owners is only one way in this case – to leave the company earlier, preventing the redistribution of shares, – immediately after the appeal majoritarian with the consent of the exit or after the division of his share. However, to do this, you need to be careful and timely respond to changes in the registry.


Advantages/trap № 4. Exclusion of shareholder.

The protection against the unlawful exclusion of shareholders is realized due to the lack of exclusion opportunities for non-fulfillment of shareholder`s obligations. But such protection may result in blocking decisions that require a unanimous vote if there are shareholders who do not systematically attend meetings and do not send representatives.

It is possible to exclude such shareholder show (until 17.06.2019) only if such provisions exist in the charter of the company (during the year from the moment of the entry into force of the law, the charter is valid). Starting from June 17, 2019, it will be impossible to exclude a shareholder due to non-fulfillment of duties, because the specified norm of the statute will be in conflict with the law.

What to do then? To exclude such shareholders now or to conclude a corporate agreement, which would consolidate the obligation to sell a share in case of non-participation in the meeting. However, in the case of exclusion, the outcome may be a lawsuit and the need to prove the non-fulfillment of obligations. And for the conclusion of a corporate agreement, you need consent.


Advantages/trap № 5. Payment is not necessary?

The flexibility of the new law is its great advantage over the previous one. But at some points, the law can be called too flexible.

By establishing the general rule – the obligation to pay to a shareholder who has left, the market value of its share during the year, the law allows changing this term in the charter. There are no maximum or minimum limits. Therefore, it is allowed to determine in the charter terms of 50 or 100 years.

Thus, the outcome of the participant will not have content, and the cost of the share significantly devalues, because it is determined on the day preceding the state registration of changes.


What to do?

The risks of the new law may cause anxiety, which can hardly be called unjustified. However, it is possible to protect oneself and the company, by means of drafting a quality charter and concluding a corporate agreement. In these documents, it is possible to regulate as much as possible in detail all procedures and predict possible risks, establish procedures for action in case of conflict, the obligation to obtain consent to alienate a stake, fix a percentage or the number of votes, other than the size of the share. This will substantially minimize the risks of the new law.


You may like
A new law on virtual assets: the picture is formed, but without details. On September 8, 2021, the Verkhovna Rada has finally adopted the long-awaited law "On Virtual Assets", which clarified many ambiguous points. This is especially true for the status of cryptocurrency and the rules of its circulation in the country. Let`s take a closer look at novelties. An ambiguous term Let's start with what the legislator actually means by "virtual assets". There are the following features:  they are an intangible good (cannot be represented on tangible media)  fall under the list of objects of civil rights (that is, they can be owned and be disposed of)  represent an electronic form of a set of data (essentially, they are blocks of information put in order);  the existence and circulation of assets are due to software tools (specific electronic environment). From these features we can draw the following conclusion: virtual assets are not limited to cryptocurrency. Digital currency is part of the concept, but other instruments, such as tokens, NFTs, or even in-game items, fall under the definition. Actually, the actual existence of most digital products, having a certain value, is due to the software environment (ecosystem), either it is blockchain technology, a trading platform, or an online game server. It should be noted that the attempt to define virtual assets was already made in the adopted Law of Ukraine in counteracting money laundering. In this act, they understand it as digital means of payment, which goes against the new definition. As a result, there are now two different explanations for virtual assets, which causes significant confusion not only in regulation but also in interpretation. It is definitely necessary to expect clarifications from competent state bodies. Let's return to the new law. Its application covers legal relations in which the "Ukrainian element" is present:  provider or recipient of services represented in Ukraine;  an agreement according to which the turnover of virtual assets is carried out in accordance with Ukrainian legislation;  the acquirer of assets (or both counterparties) is a resident(s) of Ukraine. The law also introduces an interesting division of all virtual assets into two groups: secured and unsecured. Here again, there is a problem of interpretation. The first category includes products exchanged for (state) currency, the second category includes instruments that can be exchanged only for other digital assets. There is an alternative opinion: that the turnover of secured assets is supported by real goods (money or other property), while unsecured ones are not supported by anything. The latter interpretation is the most credible, as the new law stipulates that virtual assets are NOT means of payment. Moreover, they cannot be exchanged for real goods, be they property, services or money. This significantly narrows the potential for the use of virtual assets not only for commercial but also for civilian purposes. About obligatory licensing The new law states that in some cases, the use of virtual assets will require licensing. The 4 types of activity are mentioned:  storage and management of virtual assets (or its` keys)  servicing of exchange operations with virtual assets (both for other analogues and for real goods);  translation of digital assets;  any intermediary services. A list is quite impressive, but there are some important exclusions:  if your service works with cryptocurrency wallet (it means users can dispose of accumulations into cryptocurrency independently);  If your service works on smart contracts or decentralized protocol, based on which internal transfers are performed. As to intermediary services, everything is more compicated. Actually, any mediation is based on the public share offering. That is why it is subject to licensing. How to get a license? A company that wishes on legal grounds to engage in virtual assets must satisfy legislative requirements. The key role is played by the minimum amount of the statutory capital, which equals 1,19 million hryvnyas (for non-residents it is 5,95 million hryvnyas) in case of storage and administration. For other types of activity (trading, translation and mediation services) the minimum size of the statutory capital amounts to 595 thousand hryvnyas (for non-residents is 2,98 million hryvnyas). The order of the registration of license:  to compose an application and prepare documents.  to pay state fee (68-136 thousand hryvnyas for residents and 340-680 thousand hryvnyas is for non-residents).  to pend review of the request (30 days).  to get a license. The duration of the license is 1 year. No norms about the continuation of legal force of permission are set (we are expecting amendments or explanations from the Ministry of Digital transformation of Ukraine). Notably that non-residents must pay a far greater sum, than domestic companies. The Ukrainian legislator obviously encourages an internal market, getting rid of a strong foreign presence (that, in fact, coincide with modern politics of the state on the whole). Together with an application, the following documents must be prepared: The access code to the copy of the Statute of the company (or the foundation agreement) kept in an electronic file in the database of the Unified State Register of Enterprises and Organizations (USREO);  Funding sources of the statutory capital (where the money are taken from);  confirmation of the actual injection of money;  information about beneficiaries (special attention must be paid to business reputation);  the information about the director and founders;  the check about payment of state fee;  the internal regulations, in accordance with which ones, the privacy policy rules are regulated. In the terms of volume of necessary documentation of licensing is very alike with complete registration of legal entity. It is understood that the state wants the severe adjusting of activity of organizations that will engage in virtual assets. Is it already possible to get a license? The adoption of the law by the parliament is a significant step forward in adjusting and legal market of virtual assets creation in Ukraine. However, the new rules haven`t come into effect yet - their term of introduction depends on making amendments in the Internal Revenue Code. It is yet unknown, when a legislator will decide to enter the renewed system of taxation for such assets. Being "IT-hub" and territory, where cryptocurrency enjoys large popularity, the question of taxes must be decided maximally safely. Despite the presence of obvious gaps in interpretation, a new law on virtual assets gives the official narrative of what takes place and that, how the legal relationships related to cryptocurrency will be regulated. It is to be hoped that in the nearest time the Ministry of digital information will give out the detailed explanations concerning debatable norms.

We will
call you