Appeal against Tax assessments

The Tax Code of Ukraine determines the rules of appeal against the resolutions of the tax bodies.
Appeal against Tax assessments — appeal by the tax-payer against the tax notification — resolution on evaluation of amounts of tax-payer’s monetary obligations or against any resolution of regulatory bodies according to the procedure and within the terms determined by this Tax Code and procedures for administrative appeal, or in court process. Thus, two options of appeal against the notification-resolution are possible: in administrative process (that is to say, to the tax inspection itself) or via the court process.

The Procedure of Administrative Appeal against the Tax assessments

According to the Art. 56 of the Tax Code of Ukraine (hereinafter – TCU) tax-payer shall submit a complaint to tax bodies in written form (and if necessary — accompanied by the duly certified copies of the documents, calculations and proofs, which the tax-payer believes necessary to enclose) within 10 calendar days, following the day of reception by the tax-payer of a tax notification-resolution or other resolution by regulatory body, which is being appealed. If the complaint remains without satisfaction or is satisfied in part, the tax-payer has the right within the following 10 calendar days from the day when the resolution on the examination of the complaint has been received, to submit another complaint to the State Tax Administration of Ukraine.

At the same time with the submission of the complaint to the higher tax body the tax-payer must inform the State Tax Inspection that has passed the resolution being appealed, about its appeal.

After the submission of the written appeal against the tax notification-resolution, the tax body of the higher level is obliged to examine the tax-payer’s complaint and to send to his address a motivated resolution within 20 calendar days following the reception of the complaint. The resulting resolution shall be sent by the tax body of the higher level to the tax-payer by mail with notification on delivery or issues against receipt.

Earlier, before the adoption of the TCU, the tax-payer had the right to submit a complaint on re-examination of the resolution to the tax inspection, which passed this tax notification-resolution and in case the complaint were not satisfied — to the inspection of the higher level. Presently, according to the TCU, one shall proceed directly to the higher level body — for tax inspections passing notifications-resolutions such bodies are — the state tax administrations in Autonomous Republic of Crimea (ARC), in regions, in cities Kiev and Sevastopol, the higher body for which in its turn is the State tax administration of Ukraine (in Kiev). To our mind, such amendments to the procedure of appeal of resolutions by tax bodies is positive because submission of a complaint to the same body (tax inspection of the same level), that passed such resolution is not quite logical.

If the tax-payer fails to render to the officials of the State Tax Service body the documents confirming rates described by such tax-payer in the tax reports, until the end of inspection or within three business days from the day of reception of the Act on inspection (irregardless of the reasons of such failure to render them, with the exception of cases when such documents have been seized by law enforcement bodies), it shall be considered that the tax-payer didn’t possess such documents at the moment of drawing up such reportsі. This means that the documents not submitted by the tax-payer at the time of inspection, shall not be taken into consideration during examination of the complaint against the resolution passed by the tax body. In fact, one may appeal only the interpretation by the tax body of such documents and the accuracy of use of the tax legislation.

If the resolution resulting from the complaint examination is not sent to the tax-payer within 20 days or within the prolonged term, such complaint shall be considered satisfied in full in tax-payer’s favour starting from the day following the last day of the above-mentioned periods.

The appeal submitted within the above-mentioned period of ten days stops payments by the tax-payer of the fiscal obligations determined in the tax notification-resolution for the term, which starts from the day of submission of such appeal to the regulatory body until the day of completion of the administrative appeal procedure. During this period tax demands being appealed shall not be sent and the amount of fiscal obligation shall be considered as not approved.

Court Appeal against the Resolution of the Tax Inspection

The art. 56.18 of the TCU determines that taking into account the limitation period described in the art. 102 of the TCU, tax-payer has the right to appeal in court a tax notification-resolution or other resolution by the regulatory body on charging a fiscal obligation at any time as soon as such resolution is received. As understood from the art. 102 of the TCU, tax-payer may submit to the court a claim on illegitimacy of the tax notification-resolution within 1095 days from the moment when such resolution is received. In cases when the tax-payer has proceeded to the procedure of administrative appeal before the submission to the court, the term shall be prolonged at the term that has passed in fact from the date of submission by the tax-payer a complaint to the tax body until the date when such tax-payer received the final resolution of the State Tax Administration of Ukraine passed as a result of examination of such complaint (including such date). Upon submission by the tax-payer to the court of a claim on recognition as invalid of the regulatory body’s resolution, fiscal obligation shall be considered as not-approved until the date when the court resolution would enter into its legal force.

The TCU determines that as soon as the procedure of administrative appeal has completed, the fiscal obligation shall be considered as approved and is subject to payments to the the state budget by the tax-payer within the following 10 days. If the fiscal obligations has not be paid within 10 days, it shall be considered as fiscal debt and a fine shall be accrued on it. The fiscal debt may be collected by the tax body in forced way. On the other hand, the tax-payer has the right to submit to the court a claim on recognition as invalid the tax notification-resolution within 1095 days following after the date of completion of the administrative appeal procedure. For the period of court examination the fiscal obligation is considered as not-approved until the date when the court resolution enters into its legal force. Thus, as we see, to avoid a fiscal debt it is appropriate for the tax-payer to submit to the administrative court a respective claim within 10 days from the completion of the administrative appeal procedure.

But we see that the TCU determines different terms for court appeal against tax bodies’ resolutions – 2 months and 1095 days. Judging from the court practice and basing on the Letter of the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine — dated 10.02.2011 No. 203/11/13-11, courts shall be governed by the art. 56.21 of the TCU: in cases when a regulation of the Tax Code or other regulatory legal act issued on the ground of the Tax Code, or regulations of different laws or different regulatory legal acts allow for ambiguous (multiple) interpretation of the rights and obligations of tax-payers or regulatory bodies resulting in possibility to pass a resolution in favour of a tax-payer and in favour of a regulatory body as well, the resolution shall be passed in favour of tax-payer.

Shall a tax-payer submit a respective claim to the court before the administrative appeal procedure start or during this procedure, the tax notification-resolution shall not be subject to administrative appeal and the procedure of administrative appeal that has already begun shall be stopped.

So, it’s possible to go through all procedures of appeal (including tax one), and after this to proceed to court, and it is also possible to appeal against the notification-resolution directly to the court by-passing all other options.

Our contacts:
Taras Bachynskyy
Phones:
Kyivstar +380960020100
UMC +380504317084

Appeal against Tax assessments
You may like
A new law on virtual assets: the picture is formed, but without details. On September 8, 2021, the Verkhovna Rada has finally adopted the long-awaited law "On Virtual Assets", which clarified many ambiguous points. This is especially true for the status of cryptocurrency and the rules of its circulation in the country. Let`s take a closer look at novelties. An ambiguous term Let's start with what the legislator actually means by "virtual assets". There are the following features:  they are an intangible good (cannot be represented on tangible media)  fall under the list of objects of civil rights (that is, they can be owned and be disposed of)  represent an electronic form of a set of data (essentially, they are blocks of information put in order);  the existence and circulation of assets are due to software tools (specific electronic environment). From these features we can draw the following conclusion: virtual assets are not limited to cryptocurrency. Digital currency is part of the concept, but other instruments, such as tokens, NFTs, or even in-game items, fall under the definition. Actually, the actual existence of most digital products, having a certain value, is due to the software environment (ecosystem), either it is blockchain technology, a trading platform, or an online game server. It should be noted that the attempt to define virtual assets was already made in the adopted Law of Ukraine in counteracting money laundering. In this act, they understand it as digital means of payment, which goes against the new definition. As a result, there are now two different explanations for virtual assets, which causes significant confusion not only in regulation but also in interpretation. It is definitely necessary to expect clarifications from competent state bodies. Let's return to the new law. Its application covers legal relations in which the "Ukrainian element" is present:  provider or recipient of services represented in Ukraine;  an agreement according to which the turnover of virtual assets is carried out in accordance with Ukrainian legislation;  the acquirer of assets (or both counterparties) is a resident(s) of Ukraine. The law also introduces an interesting division of all virtual assets into two groups: secured and unsecured. Here again, there is a problem of interpretation. The first category includes products exchanged for (state) currency, the second category includes instruments that can be exchanged only for other digital assets. There is an alternative opinion: that the turnover of secured assets is supported by real goods (money or other property), while unsecured ones are not supported by anything. The latter interpretation is the most credible, as the new law stipulates that virtual assets are NOT means of payment. Moreover, they cannot be exchanged for real goods, be they property, services or money. This significantly narrows the potential for the use of virtual assets not only for commercial but also for civilian purposes. About obligatory licensing The new law states that in some cases, the use of virtual assets will require licensing. The 4 types of activity are mentioned:  storage and management of virtual assets (or its` keys)  servicing of exchange operations with virtual assets (both for other analogues and for real goods);  translation of digital assets;  any intermediary services. A list is quite impressive, but there are some important exclusions:  if your service works with cryptocurrency wallet (it means users can dispose of accumulations into cryptocurrency independently);  If your service works on smart contracts or decentralized protocol, based on which internal transfers are performed. As to intermediary services, everything is more compicated. Actually, any mediation is based on the public share offering. That is why it is subject to licensing. How to get a license? A company that wishes on legal grounds to engage in virtual assets must satisfy legislative requirements. The key role is played by the minimum amount of the statutory capital, which equals 1,19 million hryvnyas (for non-residents it is 5,95 million hryvnyas) in case of storage and administration. For other types of activity (trading, translation and mediation services) the minimum size of the statutory capital amounts to 595 thousand hryvnyas (for non-residents is 2,98 million hryvnyas). The order of the registration of license:  to compose an application and prepare documents.  to pay state fee (68-136 thousand hryvnyas for residents and 340-680 thousand hryvnyas is for non-residents).  to pend review of the request (30 days).  to get a license. The duration of the license is 1 year. No norms about the continuation of legal force of permission are set (we are expecting amendments or explanations from the Ministry of Digital transformation of Ukraine). Notably that non-residents must pay a far greater sum, than domestic companies. The Ukrainian legislator obviously encourages an internal market, getting rid of a strong foreign presence (that, in fact, coincide with modern politics of the state on the whole). Together with an application, the following documents must be prepared: The access code to the copy of the Statute of the company (or the foundation agreement) kept in an electronic file in the database of the Unified State Register of Enterprises and Organizations (USREO);  Funding sources of the statutory capital (where the money are taken from);  confirmation of the actual injection of money;  information about beneficiaries (special attention must be paid to business reputation);  the information about the director and founders;  the check about payment of state fee;  the internal regulations, in accordance with which ones, the privacy policy rules are regulated. In the terms of volume of necessary documentation of licensing is very alike with complete registration of legal entity. It is understood that the state wants the severe adjusting of activity of organizations that will engage in virtual assets. Is it already possible to get a license? The adoption of the law by the parliament is a significant step forward in adjusting and legal market of virtual assets creation in Ukraine. However, the new rules haven`t come into effect yet - their term of introduction depends on making amendments in the Internal Revenue Code. It is yet unknown, when a legislator will decide to enter the renewed system of taxation for such assets. Being "IT-hub" and territory, where cryptocurrency enjoys large popularity, the question of taxes must be decided maximally safely. Despite the presence of obvious gaps in interpretation, a new law on virtual assets gives the official narrative of what takes place and that, how the legal relationships related to cryptocurrency will be regulated. It is to be hoped that in the nearest time the Ministry of digital information will give out the detailed explanations concerning debatable norms.
20/01/2022

We will
call you