Results of the year: what brought 2018 to the business?

фото: platforma-msb.org Results of the year: what brought the 2018th in the business?
In December, all people can be divided into two types: those who want to finish something before the end of the year, and those who have already postponed everything for the next one. In our opinion, December is the right time to look back and take stock of the year in business activities.
2018 is a year with a lot of changes in corporate regulation, often concerning the same relationship. But first things first.
At first, there was an agreement on the implementation of rights … (corporate?)
In February, amendments (1984-VIII, dated March 23, 2017), which introduced the concept of an agreement on the implementation of rights of shareholders in a limited liability company, came into force. And although the term “corporate agreement” was not formally introduced, the business community was well aware of the nature of these agreements.
Although formally Article 6 of the Civil Code has always allowed for the conclusion of any contracts, regardless of whether they are provided for by current legislation or not, the parties always place more hopes on the “legalized” contract.
The law also introduced the concept and made it possible to issue an irrevocable power of attorney. In the realities of Ukraine, its application raises many questions and does not inspire confidence at all, however, such a power of attorney is an essential attribute of shareholders of agreements in the common law system. And if in Ukraine the shareholder, who issued such a power of attorney, is necessarily “allowed” to the general meeting, his vote is also taken into account, then in the countries of the common system such a situation is impossible.
And if you thought that after February everyone rushed to enter into corporate agreements, then no, they did not. And there are several reasons for this.
First, the institution of a corporate agreement is still new for Ukraine. Therefore, not every shareholder understands their purpose, goals, advantages and opportunities.
Secondly, in February there was already signed and published the law, which after four months was destined to abolish innovations regarding the “agreement on the implementation of rights”, consolidate the concept of a corporate contract and liberalize the legislation on LLC and ALC as much as possible.
A new law on companies
On June 17, the Law “On Limited Liability and Additional Liability Companies” came into force (2275-VIII, February 6, 2018). What did the new law bring?
Simplification of many procedures, less dependence on the charter, the possibility not to indicate unnecessary information in it, management optimization, the possibility of using technologies (video conferencing) and a clearer exit procedure.
However, besides the wide possibilities at their discretion to regulate the company’s activities, conclude a corporate contract or sell a share without amending the charter, the new law brought many inaccuracies and questions, and some procedures may have complicated.
For example, to change the list of founders under the new law, it is not necessary to change the charter, involve the company, and the applicant is, for example, an alienator of a share.
However, such a procedure makes life easier only if the charter does not define a list of founders or if there is a conflict between the shareholder, who goes out, and the company.
In the case of a peaceful existence, instead of one registration action, several steps need to be taken: first, to change the list of the shareholders, and then to amend the charter. If earlier everything could be established by one minutes, then according to the new law, different applicants are provided for various registration actions.
The question of concluding a civil contract with the chairman of a collegial executive body remains ambiguous. If such a contract can be terminated (part 7 of article 39), then, obviously, it can be concluded. But nobody asked the fiscals about it. We are waiting for someone to ask the fiscals or the court.
There are many such questions in the law, but one should not expect an immediate answer to them. It takes at least several years to develop positions for the application of regulations.
The field of inspections was hot all year round: a smart moratorium and draconian fines from the Labor Services.
The law on the state budget for the outgoing year granted the Cabinet of Ministers the right to remove certain bodies, that are “ready” to apply a risk-oriented approach, from the moratorium/
And on December 18, 2017, the Cabinet approved such a list. Consequently, in 2018, we entered under the fear of the appointment of scheduled inspections of the SFS, SACI, eco inspection, medicines service, the State Food Consumer Service, the SSES, of a number of other bodies, but the main thing is Labor Services.
Implementation of the so-called “smart moratorium” at the end of last year actually led to its abolition, due to the rather wide list of bodies to which the moratorium did not extend.
But the partial abolition of the moratorium is not the worst. We at least know about scheduled inspections: we can check the plan for next year, we receive a message in 10 days and, accordingly, we have at least some time.
But the worst current “enemy” of business – the Labor Services does not warn.
And yet – they has a number of their own grounds for conducting inspection visits, the validity of which can be checked only in court. In addition they have a number of their own views on its special status, as well as on the powers of inspectors. And it is often only the court that succeeds in putting an end to or giving a substantiated answer in a dispute.
The September order of the Government to strengthen inspections in the field of labor relations has kindled fire even more, and news of several million’s fines become commonplace.
But the excessive freedom of the inspector can turn Labour Services into a serious punitive body. And this is not a risk oriented approach, but a way of filling the budget.
Therefore, follow the main changes in the legislation concerning the business environment, remember your rights and be able to protect them. And if the need arises – we will help.

Olesia Todoriuk
associate at Attorney at Law “Bachynskyy and Partners”
assistant attorney of Andriy Kavchuk, head of practice
corporate law and compliance]]>

You may like
A new law on virtual assets: the picture is formed, but without details. On September 8, 2021, the Verkhovna Rada has finally adopted the long-awaited law "On Virtual Assets", which clarified many ambiguous points. This is especially true for the status of cryptocurrency and the rules of its circulation in the country. Let`s take a closer look at novelties. An ambiguous term Let's start with what the legislator actually means by "virtual assets". There are the following features:  they are an intangible good (cannot be represented on tangible media)  fall under the list of objects of civil rights (that is, they can be owned and be disposed of)  represent an electronic form of a set of data (essentially, they are blocks of information put in order);  the existence and circulation of assets are due to software tools (specific electronic environment). From these features we can draw the following conclusion: virtual assets are not limited to cryptocurrency. Digital currency is part of the concept, but other instruments, such as tokens, NFTs, or even in-game items, fall under the definition. Actually, the actual existence of most digital products, having a certain value, is due to the software environment (ecosystem), either it is blockchain technology, a trading platform, or an online game server. It should be noted that the attempt to define virtual assets was already made in the adopted Law of Ukraine in counteracting money laundering. In this act, they understand it as digital means of payment, which goes against the new definition. As a result, there are now two different explanations for virtual assets, which causes significant confusion not only in regulation but also in interpretation. It is definitely necessary to expect clarifications from competent state bodies. Let's return to the new law. Its application covers legal relations in which the "Ukrainian element" is present:  provider or recipient of services represented in Ukraine;  an agreement according to which the turnover of virtual assets is carried out in accordance with Ukrainian legislation;  the acquirer of assets (or both counterparties) is a resident(s) of Ukraine. The law also introduces an interesting division of all virtual assets into two groups: secured and unsecured. Here again, there is a problem of interpretation. The first category includes products exchanged for (state) currency, the second category includes instruments that can be exchanged only for other digital assets. There is an alternative opinion: that the turnover of secured assets is supported by real goods (money or other property), while unsecured ones are not supported by anything. The latter interpretation is the most credible, as the new law stipulates that virtual assets are NOT means of payment. Moreover, they cannot be exchanged for real goods, be they property, services or money. This significantly narrows the potential for the use of virtual assets not only for commercial but also for civilian purposes. About obligatory licensing The new law states that in some cases, the use of virtual assets will require licensing. The 4 types of activity are mentioned:  storage and management of virtual assets (or its` keys)  servicing of exchange operations with virtual assets (both for other analogues and for real goods);  translation of digital assets;  any intermediary services. A list is quite impressive, but there are some important exclusions:  if your service works with cryptocurrency wallet (it means users can dispose of accumulations into cryptocurrency independently);  If your service works on smart contracts or decentralized protocol, based on which internal transfers are performed. As to intermediary services, everything is more compicated. Actually, any mediation is based on the public share offering. That is why it is subject to licensing. How to get a license? A company that wishes on legal grounds to engage in virtual assets must satisfy legislative requirements. The key role is played by the minimum amount of the statutory capital, which equals 1,19 million hryvnyas (for non-residents it is 5,95 million hryvnyas) in case of storage and administration. For other types of activity (trading, translation and mediation services) the minimum size of the statutory capital amounts to 595 thousand hryvnyas (for non-residents is 2,98 million hryvnyas). The order of the registration of license:  to compose an application and prepare documents.  to pay state fee (68-136 thousand hryvnyas for residents and 340-680 thousand hryvnyas is for non-residents).  to pend review of the request (30 days).  to get a license. The duration of the license is 1 year. No norms about the continuation of legal force of permission are set (we are expecting amendments or explanations from the Ministry of Digital transformation of Ukraine). Notably that non-residents must pay a far greater sum, than domestic companies. The Ukrainian legislator obviously encourages an internal market, getting rid of a strong foreign presence (that, in fact, coincide with modern politics of the state on the whole). Together with an application, the following documents must be prepared: The access code to the copy of the Statute of the company (or the foundation agreement) kept in an electronic file in the database of the Unified State Register of Enterprises and Organizations (USREO);  Funding sources of the statutory capital (where the money are taken from);  confirmation of the actual injection of money;  information about beneficiaries (special attention must be paid to business reputation);  the information about the director and founders;  the check about payment of state fee;  the internal regulations, in accordance with which ones, the privacy policy rules are regulated. In the terms of volume of necessary documentation of licensing is very alike with complete registration of legal entity. It is understood that the state wants the severe adjusting of activity of organizations that will engage in virtual assets. Is it already possible to get a license? The adoption of the law by the parliament is a significant step forward in adjusting and legal market of virtual assets creation in Ukraine. However, the new rules haven`t come into effect yet - their term of introduction depends on making amendments in the Internal Revenue Code. It is yet unknown, when a legislator will decide to enter the renewed system of taxation for such assets. Being "IT-hub" and territory, where cryptocurrency enjoys large popularity, the question of taxes must be decided maximally safely. Despite the presence of obvious gaps in interpretation, a new law on virtual assets gives the official narrative of what takes place and that, how the legal relationships related to cryptocurrency will be regulated. It is to be hoped that in the nearest time the Ministry of digital information will give out the detailed explanations concerning debatable norms.
20/01/2022

We will
call you