Determination of the child’s residence place

As you could see from our previous publications, the issue of divorce may be solved “peacefully” or “in conflict”. The fact that these issues are closely interrelated and any divorce always implies the determination of the child’s residence.

When determining the child’s residence place parents have equal rights – they have the same guarantees for upbringing and communication. The place of residence of their son or daughter is determined by agreement of both parents. The opinion of the child, in this case, is taken into account only since the age of 10. A 14-year-old person is entitled to decide independently with whom he/she wants to live.

Anyway, it is impossible to deal without third-party – court, notary or guardianship authority.

Notary. Before or after marriage the couple may conclude a prenuptial agreement (marriage contract), which will provide their mutual rights and obligations, including the provisions of their children’s residence place in case of divorce, and parental role in the upbringing and material support. If you don’t want to conclude the prenuptial agreement it is possible to conclude a separate contract that would deal strictly with “separation” of children. Both contracts must be notarized.


– Written fixation of all deals;

– Avoid taking a matter to court in the future.


  • notary costs.

Guardianship authority. This body participates in case if during the divorce the issue of children’s residence did not raise. As a rule, the judgment always says, “There is no dispute concerning children between parties”. However, the practice demonstrates that very often the dispute does appear in the nearest future. In this case, it is worth applying to the local guardianship authority. Their commission will hold the hearing and make a decision concerning the best place of residence for a child. The decision has a binding force for both parents.


– free of charge;

– relatively quickly (when making comparison with courts).


– it may be not the end,  as nobody can forbid one of parents to suit.

Court. We have already mentioned a couple cannot avoid court if they have children. There are two ways to solve the issue – a quick and along.

QUICK WAY: submitting of joint application for divorce by spouses + adding of notarized contract (see above) = the dispute is settled quickly and everyone is satisfied.

LONG WAY: there is a conflict and dispute between parents, the joint application is impossible.

In such cases, the guardianship authority is an obligatory participant.

The judgment depends on many factors, both subjective and objective. For example, age and sex of a child, child’s attitude towards parents, financial abilities of mother and father, etc. As a rule, children are 99,9% left with their mother.


– additional guarantee for the parent who wins the case. There is a criminal responsibility for non-enforcement of a court judgment.


– time-consuming;

– the expensiveness of the procedure.

Our lawyers are always ready to help you with the determination of the child’s residence place. Contact us and we will give you exhaustive legal advice.


You may like
A new law on virtual assets: the picture is formed, but without details. On September 8, 2021, the Verkhovna Rada has finally adopted the long-awaited law "On Virtual Assets", which clarified many ambiguous points. This is especially true for the status of cryptocurrency and the rules of its circulation in the country. Let`s take a closer look at novelties. An ambiguous term Let's start with what the legislator actually means by "virtual assets". There are the following features:  they are an intangible good (cannot be represented on tangible media)  fall under the list of objects of civil rights (that is, they can be owned and be disposed of)  represent an electronic form of a set of data (essentially, they are blocks of information put in order);  the existence and circulation of assets are due to software tools (specific electronic environment). From these features we can draw the following conclusion: virtual assets are not limited to cryptocurrency. Digital currency is part of the concept, but other instruments, such as tokens, NFTs, or even in-game items, fall under the definition. Actually, the actual existence of most digital products, having a certain value, is due to the software environment (ecosystem), either it is blockchain technology, a trading platform, or an online game server. It should be noted that the attempt to define virtual assets was already made in the adopted Law of Ukraine in counteracting money laundering. In this act, they understand it as digital means of payment, which goes against the new definition. As a result, there are now two different explanations for virtual assets, which causes significant confusion not only in regulation but also in interpretation. It is definitely necessary to expect clarifications from competent state bodies. Let's return to the new law. Its application covers legal relations in which the "Ukrainian element" is present:  provider or recipient of services represented in Ukraine;  an agreement according to which the turnover of virtual assets is carried out in accordance with Ukrainian legislation;  the acquirer of assets (or both counterparties) is a resident(s) of Ukraine. The law also introduces an interesting division of all virtual assets into two groups: secured and unsecured. Here again, there is a problem of interpretation. The first category includes products exchanged for (state) currency, the second category includes instruments that can be exchanged only for other digital assets. There is an alternative opinion: that the turnover of secured assets is supported by real goods (money or other property), while unsecured ones are not supported by anything. The latter interpretation is the most credible, as the new law stipulates that virtual assets are NOT means of payment. Moreover, they cannot be exchanged for real goods, be they property, services or money. This significantly narrows the potential for the use of virtual assets not only for commercial but also for civilian purposes. About obligatory licensing The new law states that in some cases, the use of virtual assets will require licensing. The 4 types of activity are mentioned:  storage and management of virtual assets (or its` keys)  servicing of exchange operations with virtual assets (both for other analogues and for real goods);  translation of digital assets;  any intermediary services. A list is quite impressive, but there are some important exclusions:  if your service works with cryptocurrency wallet (it means users can dispose of accumulations into cryptocurrency independently);  If your service works on smart contracts or decentralized protocol, based on which internal transfers are performed. As to intermediary services, everything is more compicated. Actually, any mediation is based on the public share offering. That is why it is subject to licensing. How to get a license? A company that wishes on legal grounds to engage in virtual assets must satisfy legislative requirements. The key role is played by the minimum amount of the statutory capital, which equals 1,19 million hryvnyas (for non-residents it is 5,95 million hryvnyas) in case of storage and administration. For other types of activity (trading, translation and mediation services) the minimum size of the statutory capital amounts to 595 thousand hryvnyas (for non-residents is 2,98 million hryvnyas). The order of the registration of license:  to compose an application and prepare documents.  to pay state fee (68-136 thousand hryvnyas for residents and 340-680 thousand hryvnyas is for non-residents).  to pend review of the request (30 days).  to get a license. The duration of the license is 1 year. No norms about the continuation of legal force of permission are set (we are expecting amendments or explanations from the Ministry of Digital transformation of Ukraine). Notably that non-residents must pay a far greater sum, than domestic companies. The Ukrainian legislator obviously encourages an internal market, getting rid of a strong foreign presence (that, in fact, coincide with modern politics of the state on the whole). Together with an application, the following documents must be prepared: The access code to the copy of the Statute of the company (or the foundation agreement) kept in an electronic file in the database of the Unified State Register of Enterprises and Organizations (USREO);  Funding sources of the statutory capital (where the money are taken from);  confirmation of the actual injection of money;  information about beneficiaries (special attention must be paid to business reputation);  the information about the director and founders;  the check about payment of state fee;  the internal regulations, in accordance with which ones, the privacy policy rules are regulated. In the terms of volume of necessary documentation of licensing is very alike with complete registration of legal entity. It is understood that the state wants the severe adjusting of activity of organizations that will engage in virtual assets. Is it already possible to get a license? The adoption of the law by the parliament is a significant step forward in adjusting and legal market of virtual assets creation in Ukraine. However, the new rules haven`t come into effect yet - their term of introduction depends on making amendments in the Internal Revenue Code. It is yet unknown, when a legislator will decide to enter the renewed system of taxation for such assets. Being "IT-hub" and territory, where cryptocurrency enjoys large popularity, the question of taxes must be decided maximally safely. Despite the presence of obvious gaps in interpretation, a new law on virtual assets gives the official narrative of what takes place and that, how the legal relationships related to cryptocurrency will be regulated. It is to be hoped that in the nearest time the Ministry of digital information will give out the detailed explanations concerning debatable norms.

We will
call you