A New Step To Economic Recovery: The laws that could revitalize the financial sector have been adopted

Recently, the President of Ukraine announced the signing of two legislative acts that would “clear” the financial sector and revitalize it. There is about the Law act No 6027-d “On Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Regarding Restoration of Lending (Amendment)” and the Law act No 8331-d “On Certain Legislative Acts on Improving the Functioning of the Financial Sector (Amendment)”. Changes made by legislative acts can really have a positive impact on the economy and finance. But everything is in order
Lending renewal Law act
Law No. 6027-d amends the regulation of the following questions:

  • Bank secrecy disclosure

The requirement of disclosing banking secrecy of a competent body must necessarily include the surname, name and patronymic of the person the body wishes to receive the information, and the tax code too. Sn accordance with Art. 62 of the Law act “On Banks and Banking”Competent bodies are the prosecutor’s offices, the SSA, the NAB, the SBI, the National Police, the Antimonopoly Committee.

  • Bail agreement

The bail agreement now may contain a reference to the deed, that set the main obligation. Also, for an agreement establishing a bail on a vehicle, now it’s enough just written form, without a notarial certificate.
The law contains nowelty about the termination of the bail agreement. Thus, the bail will have the right to recover the property of the debtor-legal entity after its liquidation, if it has been realized this right before the termination of the term – a claim or requirement is filed. Actually, the law does not define the form and content of such a requirement

  • Obligation of joint debtors

The legislative act introduces amendments to the art. 543 of the Civil code, namely: the amount and terms of fulfillment of the obligation of joint debtors to the creditor does not change after the death (or liquidators, if a legal entity) of one of them. Previously, the legislation did not contain norms what regulated legal relations in the event of termination of one legal entity that was one of the debtors.

  •  Termination of borrow

In the case of a change in the obligation in the absence of the consent of the guarantor, resulting in an increase in the liability of the debtor, the guarantor is responsible in the amount that was before the change of obligation, if the debtor will violate the obligation. In addition, the termination of a debtor-legal entity through liquidation will not always terminate the surety. The creditor will have the right to fulfill the obligation if he had time to apply to the guarantor of the claim until the information on the liquidation is made to the U.S.D.

  •  Interest on loan agreements

The legislative act brings an important novelty to protect borrowers from raising the bank’s interest rate in variable rate loan agreements. In case the borrower does not agree with the increase of the rate, he will be able to terminate the agreement. In this case, he is obliged to repay for 30 days the loan within of the existing rate. Also, the provisions of the legislative act oblige the bank to indicate in the agreement the maximum possible size of the rate.

  • Out-of-court settlement of a dispute regarding mortgage agreements

The legislative act establishes the provisions that must be specified in the agreement on satisfaction of the requirements of the mortgagee or in the appropriate reservation. So, it is necessary to determine the conditions under which the microcontroller will be able to use its right to extrajudicial settlement, also how to determine the cost of acquiring mortgage mortgage and how to exchange information between the parties.
Also, if earlier the settlement in the out-of-court procedure, all other requirements of the mortgagee regarding the fulfillment of the obligation were null and void, mow such requirements to the legal entity or PPE are valid, unless the contrary is indicated in the contract.
In addition, if the requirements are provided by several subjects, and the out-of-court settlement has occurred only in relation to one or several (but not all), the mortgagee has the right to claim in the part that remains unregulated.

  • Electronic documents in banking services

Now, cash and settlement services can be provided on the basis of an electronic document, and the receipt of an electronic payment instrument has the right not only the client, but also his representative by power of attorney.
Law act on Improving the Functioning of the Financial Sector
This law introduces some changes in the powers of the National Bank and the creation and management of state-owned banks in Ukraine.

  • National Bank

The main powers that are additionally allocated to the National Bank are:
–        Storage of banknotes and coins in banks
–        Carry out audits of such banks regarding the storage of cash
–        Granting, renewal and withdrawal of licenses for the collection of funds

  • State Banks

Now, the Cabinet of Ministers is the supreme governing body of state banks. To create a state-owned bank, it is not necessary to receive a positive conclusion of the NBU. Decisions taken by the CMU as the supreme governing body do not need to be agreed with other interested bodies. The exclusive competence of the CMU in particular includes the appointment and dismissal of members of the supervisory board, the decision to reorganize, liquidation of the state bank.
The Supervisory Board of the State Bank will consist of nine members, three of which are representatives of the government, and six – independent members. The law act establishes requirements for persons who apply to be members of the supervisory board, in particular, to prevent conflicts of interest. A commission is formed and a competition is held for selection of candidates for the supervisory board, members of which also get out of the open competition. In general, the members of the supervisory board are subject to high requirements and expectations, as evidenced by the list of their powers, as well as a list of reasons (more than 10) for their dismissal.
Of course, the adopted Lending renewal Law introduces positive novelties in the field of relations related to lending and credit facilities.
The norm about immutability of amount of the liability of joint debtors provides guarantees to such debtors and protects them against the possibility of abuse by other debtors – legal entities by the liquidation.
The provisions on the liability of guarantors in the initial amount is also a positive moment and protects their interests from possible abuses by debtors, since an increase in liability is possible only with their consent.
Lenders and borrowers have certain guarantees of protection of their interests. Lenders now have instruments for foreclosure in case of termination of legal entities – debtors and guarantors. This in turn should be a good incentive to increase the volume of business lending, as the debtor will not be able to reduce the amount of obligations by eliminating and possibly manipulations, Bounded with it.
Lenders are now entitled to refuse to pay interest on the loan after raising the rate and have some time to repay the loan at the rate set at the time of receiving the loan. This norm is fair enough and will enable to avoid excessive debt burden. Let’s see how the law will work in practice.
Taras Yatsyshchuk
junior associate of
corporate law and compliance practice
 AL “Bachynsky and partners”

You may like
A new law on virtual assets: the picture is formed, but without details. On September 8, 2021, the Verkhovna Rada has finally adopted the long-awaited law "On Virtual Assets", which clarified many ambiguous points. This is especially true for the status of cryptocurrency and the rules of its circulation in the country. Let`s take a closer look at novelties. An ambiguous term Let's start with what the legislator actually means by "virtual assets". There are the following features:  they are an intangible good (cannot be represented on tangible media)  fall under the list of objects of civil rights (that is, they can be owned and be disposed of)  represent an electronic form of a set of data (essentially, they are blocks of information put in order);  the existence and circulation of assets are due to software tools (specific electronic environment). From these features we can draw the following conclusion: virtual assets are not limited to cryptocurrency. Digital currency is part of the concept, but other instruments, such as tokens, NFTs, or even in-game items, fall under the definition. Actually, the actual existence of most digital products, having a certain value, is due to the software environment (ecosystem), either it is blockchain technology, a trading platform, or an online game server. It should be noted that the attempt to define virtual assets was already made in the adopted Law of Ukraine in counteracting money laundering. In this act, they understand it as digital means of payment, which goes against the new definition. As a result, there are now two different explanations for virtual assets, which causes significant confusion not only in regulation but also in interpretation. It is definitely necessary to expect clarifications from competent state bodies. Let's return to the new law. Its application covers legal relations in which the "Ukrainian element" is present:  provider or recipient of services represented in Ukraine;  an agreement according to which the turnover of virtual assets is carried out in accordance with Ukrainian legislation;  the acquirer of assets (or both counterparties) is a resident(s) of Ukraine. The law also introduces an interesting division of all virtual assets into two groups: secured and unsecured. Here again, there is a problem of interpretation. The first category includes products exchanged for (state) currency, the second category includes instruments that can be exchanged only for other digital assets. There is an alternative opinion: that the turnover of secured assets is supported by real goods (money or other property), while unsecured ones are not supported by anything. The latter interpretation is the most credible, as the new law stipulates that virtual assets are NOT means of payment. Moreover, they cannot be exchanged for real goods, be they property, services or money. This significantly narrows the potential for the use of virtual assets not only for commercial but also for civilian purposes. About obligatory licensing The new law states that in some cases, the use of virtual assets will require licensing. The 4 types of activity are mentioned:  storage and management of virtual assets (or its` keys)  servicing of exchange operations with virtual assets (both for other analogues and for real goods);  translation of digital assets;  any intermediary services. A list is quite impressive, but there are some important exclusions:  if your service works with cryptocurrency wallet (it means users can dispose of accumulations into cryptocurrency independently);  If your service works on smart contracts or decentralized protocol, based on which internal transfers are performed. As to intermediary services, everything is more compicated. Actually, any mediation is based on the public share offering. That is why it is subject to licensing. How to get a license? A company that wishes on legal grounds to engage in virtual assets must satisfy legislative requirements. The key role is played by the minimum amount of the statutory capital, which equals 1,19 million hryvnyas (for non-residents it is 5,95 million hryvnyas) in case of storage and administration. For other types of activity (trading, translation and mediation services) the minimum size of the statutory capital amounts to 595 thousand hryvnyas (for non-residents is 2,98 million hryvnyas). The order of the registration of license:  to compose an application and prepare documents.  to pay state fee (68-136 thousand hryvnyas for residents and 340-680 thousand hryvnyas is for non-residents).  to pend review of the request (30 days).  to get a license. The duration of the license is 1 year. No norms about the continuation of legal force of permission are set (we are expecting amendments or explanations from the Ministry of Digital transformation of Ukraine). Notably that non-residents must pay a far greater sum, than domestic companies. The Ukrainian legislator obviously encourages an internal market, getting rid of a strong foreign presence (that, in fact, coincide with modern politics of the state on the whole). Together with an application, the following documents must be prepared: The access code to the copy of the Statute of the company (or the foundation agreement) kept in an electronic file in the database of the Unified State Register of Enterprises and Organizations (USREO);  Funding sources of the statutory capital (where the money are taken from);  confirmation of the actual injection of money;  information about beneficiaries (special attention must be paid to business reputation);  the information about the director and founders;  the check about payment of state fee;  the internal regulations, in accordance with which ones, the privacy policy rules are regulated. In the terms of volume of necessary documentation of licensing is very alike with complete registration of legal entity. It is understood that the state wants the severe adjusting of activity of organizations that will engage in virtual assets. Is it already possible to get a license? The adoption of the law by the parliament is a significant step forward in adjusting and legal market of virtual assets creation in Ukraine. However, the new rules haven`t come into effect yet - their term of introduction depends on making amendments in the Internal Revenue Code. It is yet unknown, when a legislator will decide to enter the renewed system of taxation for such assets. Being "IT-hub" and territory, where cryptocurrency enjoys large popularity, the question of taxes must be decided maximally safely. Despite the presence of obvious gaps in interpretation, a new law on virtual assets gives the official narrative of what takes place and that, how the legal relationships related to cryptocurrency will be regulated. It is to be hoped that in the nearest time the Ministry of digital information will give out the detailed explanations concerning debatable norms.

We will
call you