Mortgage for foreign currency loans: features of collection & end of moratorium

One of the most common types of maintenance of the obligation is mortgage. This method is widespread in credit relations.

In accordance with the Law No. 898-IV of 05.06.2003, mortgage is a kind of maintenance of the obligation to real estate, according to which the creditor is entitled in case of non-fulfillment by the debtor of the obligation secured by the mortgage to satisfy its claims by recourse to the mortgage.

At the expense of the subject of the mortgage, the creditor can satisfy his claim for the main obligation in full, or in the amount that is established by the mortgage agreement. It also includes interest and penalties.

Several real estate objects can be transferred to the mortgage, in particular objects of unfinished construction. The mortgage contract is subject to a mandatory notarial certificate, and encumbrance of immovable property, which is its subject – mandatory state registration.

As a rule, the lender pays a mortgage payment in three ways: on the basis of a court decision; on the basis of the executive inscription of the notary or on the agreement on satisfaction of the requirements of the mortgagee. The last resort is considered an out-of-court settlement of the dispute.

So a contract on satisfaction of the mortgagee can be concluded either separately from the main mortgage agreement, or contained in the form of a mortgage reservation in the contract of mortgage itself. As a rule, the agreement provides for the conditions and procedure for the transfer of ownership of real estate to the creditor, as well as the right of the latter to sell the property to its third party on its own behalf. This agreement is a confirmation of the transfer of ownership of real estate to the lender and is the basis for entering information in the State Register of real rights to real estate.

It is worth noting that, as of today, a moratorium on foreclosure of real estate for loans issued in foreign currency is in effect in Ukraine.

In particular, the Law No. 1304-VII of 03.06.2014 “On the moratorium on the collection of property of citizens of Ukraine, provided as collateral for loans in foreign currency”, established that it is not possible to enforce (alienated without the consent of the owner) immovable residential property that is the subject of mortgage for a consumer loan granted to a citizen of Ukraine in a foreign currency.

The tax on such property can not be paid on condition that:


  • such property is a place of permanent residence of the borrower or is an object of unfinished construction, provided that the borrower owns no other immovable property;
  • the total area of ​​such real estate does not exceed 140 square meters. meters for an apartment and 250 sq. m. meters for a residential building;


In addition, the bank has no right to assign a debt or a consumer debt a foreign currency loan in favor of another person.


Judicial practice

The latest jurisprudence indicates the protection of the interests of the borrower in resolving this category of disputes.

The position of the Supreme Court, set forth in the Resolution No. 465/1310/17 dated October 31, 2018, is decisive. The subject of consideration was a dispute between the borrower and the creditor regarding the registration of ownership of a residential apartment, which was transferred to the mortgage, as collateral for a loan issued in foreign currency. So the plaintiff asked to recognize the decision to register the property right unlawful and cancel the notary’s executive seal, on the basis of which the ownership of the apartment for the lender was registered. Claims were motivated by the fact that the property meets the criteria specified in the Law “On the Moratorium on the Collection of Property of Citizens of Ukraine Provided as Securing Foreign Currency Loans” and, therefore, it can not be subject to coercive enforcement. In opposition to the arguments of the plaintiff, the defendant submitted written explanations, in which he noted that the operation of the said law extends to the forced realization of the property, and the enforcement of the mortgage was extrajudicially executed in accordance with the conditions of the mortgage reservation voluntarily agreed upon by the parties at the conclusion of the mortgage agreement, and therefore on controversial relationship moratorium does not apply. However, the Supreme Court disagreed with the defendant’s arguments and satisfied the plaintiff’s cassation complaint:

The enforcement of extrajudicial mortgages in the form of registration of the property right of the mortgagee to immovable property, which is the subject of a mortgage on the basis of an agreement on satisfaction of the mortgagee’s claim or the corresponding reservation in the mortgage agreement, which is equal to such an agreement, results in the alienation of the subject of mortgage in favor mortgagee without the consent of the owner of such real estate. “

‘’… Therefore, the decisive factor in resolving the dispute over the possibility of extrajudicial foreclosure on the subject of a mortgage during the term of the Law of Ukraine “On moratorium on the collection of property of Ukrainian citizens granted as security of loans in a foreign currency” is the onset of a legal consequence that in this a specific case involves the actual transfer to the mortgagee of the ownership of the subject of the mortgage, without the consent of the owner of the property.”


The end of the moratorium is very close

According to the data of the National Bank of Ukraine as of May 1, 2018, the percentage of suspended loans issued in foreign currency until 2008 amounted to 94.3%. The situation was complicated by the above Law on the moratorium, which was adopted in 2014. Converting loans to the hryvnia also did not significantly affect the situation.

All this resulted in the provision in the Transitional Provisions of the Code of Bankruptcy Procedures, adopted by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on December 19, 2018, which provides that, since the Code came into force (6 months after the date of official publication), the Law ” On a moratorium on the collection of property of Ukrainian citizens granted as collateral for loans in foreign currency “. Instead, the Code will provide for a special 5-year period for debt repayment on loans issued in foreign currency.


You may like
A new law on virtual assets: the picture is formed, but without details. On September 8, 2021, the Verkhovna Rada has finally adopted the long-awaited law "On Virtual Assets", which clarified many ambiguous points. This is especially true for the status of cryptocurrency and the rules of its circulation in the country. Let`s take a closer look at novelties. An ambiguous term Let's start with what the legislator actually means by "virtual assets". There are the following features:  they are an intangible good (cannot be represented on tangible media)  fall under the list of objects of civil rights (that is, they can be owned and be disposed of)  represent an electronic form of a set of data (essentially, they are blocks of information put in order);  the existence and circulation of assets are due to software tools (specific electronic environment). From these features we can draw the following conclusion: virtual assets are not limited to cryptocurrency. Digital currency is part of the concept, but other instruments, such as tokens, NFTs, or even in-game items, fall under the definition. Actually, the actual existence of most digital products, having a certain value, is due to the software environment (ecosystem), either it is blockchain technology, a trading platform, or an online game server. It should be noted that the attempt to define virtual assets was already made in the adopted Law of Ukraine in counteracting money laundering. In this act, they understand it as digital means of payment, which goes against the new definition. As a result, there are now two different explanations for virtual assets, which causes significant confusion not only in regulation but also in interpretation. It is definitely necessary to expect clarifications from competent state bodies. Let's return to the new law. Its application covers legal relations in which the "Ukrainian element" is present:  provider or recipient of services represented in Ukraine;  an agreement according to which the turnover of virtual assets is carried out in accordance with Ukrainian legislation;  the acquirer of assets (or both counterparties) is a resident(s) of Ukraine. The law also introduces an interesting division of all virtual assets into two groups: secured and unsecured. Here again, there is a problem of interpretation. The first category includes products exchanged for (state) currency, the second category includes instruments that can be exchanged only for other digital assets. There is an alternative opinion: that the turnover of secured assets is supported by real goods (money or other property), while unsecured ones are not supported by anything. The latter interpretation is the most credible, as the new law stipulates that virtual assets are NOT means of payment. Moreover, they cannot be exchanged for real goods, be they property, services or money. This significantly narrows the potential for the use of virtual assets not only for commercial but also for civilian purposes. About obligatory licensing The new law states that in some cases, the use of virtual assets will require licensing. The 4 types of activity are mentioned:  storage and management of virtual assets (or its` keys)  servicing of exchange operations with virtual assets (both for other analogues and for real goods);  translation of digital assets;  any intermediary services. A list is quite impressive, but there are some important exclusions:  if your service works with cryptocurrency wallet (it means users can dispose of accumulations into cryptocurrency independently);  If your service works on smart contracts or decentralized protocol, based on which internal transfers are performed. As to intermediary services, everything is more compicated. Actually, any mediation is based on the public share offering. That is why it is subject to licensing. How to get a license? A company that wishes on legal grounds to engage in virtual assets must satisfy legislative requirements. The key role is played by the minimum amount of the statutory capital, which equals 1,19 million hryvnyas (for non-residents it is 5,95 million hryvnyas) in case of storage and administration. For other types of activity (trading, translation and mediation services) the minimum size of the statutory capital amounts to 595 thousand hryvnyas (for non-residents is 2,98 million hryvnyas). The order of the registration of license:  to compose an application and prepare documents.  to pay state fee (68-136 thousand hryvnyas for residents and 340-680 thousand hryvnyas is for non-residents).  to pend review of the request (30 days).  to get a license. The duration of the license is 1 year. No norms about the continuation of legal force of permission are set (we are expecting amendments or explanations from the Ministry of Digital transformation of Ukraine). Notably that non-residents must pay a far greater sum, than domestic companies. The Ukrainian legislator obviously encourages an internal market, getting rid of a strong foreign presence (that, in fact, coincide with modern politics of the state on the whole). Together with an application, the following documents must be prepared: The access code to the copy of the Statute of the company (or the foundation agreement) kept in an electronic file in the database of the Unified State Register of Enterprises and Organizations (USREO);  Funding sources of the statutory capital (where the money are taken from);  confirmation of the actual injection of money;  information about beneficiaries (special attention must be paid to business reputation);  the information about the director and founders;  the check about payment of state fee;  the internal regulations, in accordance with which ones, the privacy policy rules are regulated. In the terms of volume of necessary documentation of licensing is very alike with complete registration of legal entity. It is understood that the state wants the severe adjusting of activity of organizations that will engage in virtual assets. Is it already possible to get a license? The adoption of the law by the parliament is a significant step forward in adjusting and legal market of virtual assets creation in Ukraine. However, the new rules haven`t come into effect yet - their term of introduction depends on making amendments in the Internal Revenue Code. It is yet unknown, when a legislator will decide to enter the renewed system of taxation for such assets. Being "IT-hub" and territory, where cryptocurrency enjoys large popularity, the question of taxes must be decided maximally safely. Despite the presence of obvious gaps in interpretation, a new law on virtual assets gives the official narrative of what takes place and that, how the legal relationships related to cryptocurrency will be regulated. It is to be hoped that in the nearest time the Ministry of digital information will give out the detailed explanations concerning debatable norms.

We will
call you