Main schemes for selling apartments in new buildings: the risks and advantages

Developers in Lviv use different schemes for selling apartments in new buildings. There are 5 basic schemes for selling apartments in new buildings in Lviv:
– Housing and Construction Cooperative (HCC)
– Preliminary sale-purchase agreement of apartment;
– Sale and purchase agreement of property rights;
– Construction Financing Fund (CFF);
– Forward contract.
You conclude the contract for payment of share contributions  to HCC as the associate member of this HCC.
What are the main risks of purchasing the apartment through HCC?
1. Possibility of double sale (the account of apartments is conducted only by the developer).
2. Initially, all the rights to the building belong to the Cooperative.
3. Impossibility to control the use of the funds of the Cooperative.
4. Possibility of raising funds from buyers without permits on construction.
What are the advantages of the HCC scheme for the buyer?
The scheme does not carry any guarantees for you as a buyer. The advantage is only the financial side of the issue: the registration of ownership on the basis of documents provided by HСC allows you to save on notarial expenses.
The preliminary sale-purchase agreement fixes the intentions of the parties to conclude in the future the main sale-purchase agreement, after which the ownership of the apartment will be registered for the buyer. The preliminary agreement must necessarily be notarized.
What are the main risks of concluding a preliminary agreement?
1. Possibility of double sale (even notarization of the agreement does not exclude this risk, since the apartment as an object of ownership does not exist at the time of the concluding the preliminary agreement).
2. Possibility of raising funds from buyers without permits on construction.
3. Evasion of the developer from entering into a main sale-purchase agreement.
The majority of buyers also consider as the disadvantage the additional costs for notarial services and payment of taxes (1% of the contract amount – the mandatory state pension insurance fee and 1% of the contract amount – the state fee).
Under such agreement you purchase not an apartment, but only property rights to it, that after signing the act of acceptance and transfer of property rights you will get an opportunity to register the property rights.
What are the main risks?
1. Possibility of concluding several such agreements with different persons on the same apartment.
2. Possibility of raising funds from buyers without permits on construction.
What are the advantages of using it? The conclusion of this agreement does not carry any guarantees for the buyers. Only advantage is that this scheme allows avoiding additional expenses for paying taxes, as compared to concluding preliminary sale-purchase contract of the apartment.
The scheme for selling apartments in new buildings through CFF is not very common in the primary market. Besides the developer there is another legal entity – the Manager of the CFF, which must be a financial institution with the appropriate license.
What are the main advantages of the CFF scheme?
1. Procedure of use is regulated in detail by a separate law.
2. In order for the CFF to be opened, the developer must receive all necessary permits for construction.
3. The manager of the CFF is a financial institution and is under the control of the National Commission, which gives more guarantees.
4. In case of problems with construction, the Manager can replace the developer, and also it is possible to replace the Manager on the initiative of the buyers.
What are the advantages of using such scheme?
1. Often with the existence of the CFF, the price in such agreement with the Manager is much lower than in reality, and the remaining funds are transferred to a private entrepreneur under another contract.
2. The Manager is often under the control of the developer, which means that there is no real control mechanism.
This scheme of selling apartments in new buildings in Lviv is not common.
The main risk of using such scheme is that only part of the money is paid for the property rights to the apartment, the rest of the money is paid on the derivative and in the future it usually will not be returned.
The main advantage of using forward contracts – the conclusion of a contract on the Exchange minimizes the possibility of double selling an apartment.
THE BASIC RECOMMENDATION: it is necessary to analyze any scheme with the permission documents. If the developer does not have proper permits, problems with construction cannot be avoided. The sales scheme allows only predicting the complexity of the returning your money in the future, but does not show the full picture. Therefore, you need to check not only the sales scheme, but also documents for the land plot, for construction, information about the developer, etc.
For advice or legal support please contact us: 096-002-01-00 or]]>

Main schemes for selling apartments in new buildings: the risks and advantages
You may like
A new law on virtual assets: the picture is formed, but without details. On September 8, 2021, the Verkhovna Rada has finally adopted the long-awaited law "On Virtual Assets", which clarified many ambiguous points. This is especially true for the status of cryptocurrency and the rules of its circulation in the country. Let`s take a closer look at novelties. An ambiguous term Let's start with what the legislator actually means by "virtual assets". There are the following features:  they are an intangible good (cannot be represented on tangible media)  fall under the list of objects of civil rights (that is, they can be owned and be disposed of)  represent an electronic form of a set of data (essentially, they are blocks of information put in order);  the existence and circulation of assets are due to software tools (specific electronic environment). From these features we can draw the following conclusion: virtual assets are not limited to cryptocurrency. Digital currency is part of the concept, but other instruments, such as tokens, NFTs, or even in-game items, fall under the definition. Actually, the actual existence of most digital products, having a certain value, is due to the software environment (ecosystem), either it is blockchain technology, a trading platform, or an online game server. It should be noted that the attempt to define virtual assets was already made in the adopted Law of Ukraine in counteracting money laundering. In this act, they understand it as digital means of payment, which goes against the new definition. As a result, there are now two different explanations for virtual assets, which causes significant confusion not only in regulation but also in interpretation. It is definitely necessary to expect clarifications from competent state bodies. Let's return to the new law. Its application covers legal relations in which the "Ukrainian element" is present:  provider or recipient of services represented in Ukraine;  an agreement according to which the turnover of virtual assets is carried out in accordance with Ukrainian legislation;  the acquirer of assets (or both counterparties) is a resident(s) of Ukraine. The law also introduces an interesting division of all virtual assets into two groups: secured and unsecured. Here again, there is a problem of interpretation. The first category includes products exchanged for (state) currency, the second category includes instruments that can be exchanged only for other digital assets. There is an alternative opinion: that the turnover of secured assets is supported by real goods (money or other property), while unsecured ones are not supported by anything. The latter interpretation is the most credible, as the new law stipulates that virtual assets are NOT means of payment. Moreover, they cannot be exchanged for real goods, be they property, services or money. This significantly narrows the potential for the use of virtual assets not only for commercial but also for civilian purposes. About obligatory licensing The new law states that in some cases, the use of virtual assets will require licensing. The 4 types of activity are mentioned:  storage and management of virtual assets (or its` keys)  servicing of exchange operations with virtual assets (both for other analogues and for real goods);  translation of digital assets;  any intermediary services. A list is quite impressive, but there are some important exclusions:  if your service works with cryptocurrency wallet (it means users can dispose of accumulations into cryptocurrency independently);  If your service works on smart contracts or decentralized protocol, based on which internal transfers are performed. As to intermediary services, everything is more compicated. Actually, any mediation is based on the public share offering. That is why it is subject to licensing. How to get a license? A company that wishes on legal grounds to engage in virtual assets must satisfy legislative requirements. The key role is played by the minimum amount of the statutory capital, which equals 1,19 million hryvnyas (for non-residents it is 5,95 million hryvnyas) in case of storage and administration. For other types of activity (trading, translation and mediation services) the minimum size of the statutory capital amounts to 595 thousand hryvnyas (for non-residents is 2,98 million hryvnyas). The order of the registration of license:  to compose an application and prepare documents.  to pay state fee (68-136 thousand hryvnyas for residents and 340-680 thousand hryvnyas is for non-residents).  to pend review of the request (30 days).  to get a license. The duration of the license is 1 year. No norms about the continuation of legal force of permission are set (we are expecting amendments or explanations from the Ministry of Digital transformation of Ukraine). Notably that non-residents must pay a far greater sum, than domestic companies. The Ukrainian legislator obviously encourages an internal market, getting rid of a strong foreign presence (that, in fact, coincide with modern politics of the state on the whole). Together with an application, the following documents must be prepared: The access code to the copy of the Statute of the company (or the foundation agreement) kept in an electronic file in the database of the Unified State Register of Enterprises and Organizations (USREO);  Funding sources of the statutory capital (where the money are taken from);  confirmation of the actual injection of money;  information about beneficiaries (special attention must be paid to business reputation);  the information about the director and founders;  the check about payment of state fee;  the internal regulations, in accordance with which ones, the privacy policy rules are regulated. In the terms of volume of necessary documentation of licensing is very alike with complete registration of legal entity. It is understood that the state wants the severe adjusting of activity of organizations that will engage in virtual assets. Is it already possible to get a license? The adoption of the law by the parliament is a significant step forward in adjusting and legal market of virtual assets creation in Ukraine. However, the new rules haven`t come into effect yet - their term of introduction depends on making amendments in the Internal Revenue Code. It is yet unknown, when a legislator will decide to enter the renewed system of taxation for such assets. Being "IT-hub" and territory, where cryptocurrency enjoys large popularity, the question of taxes must be decided maximally safely. Despite the presence of obvious gaps in interpretation, a new law on virtual assets gives the official narrative of what takes place and that, how the legal relationships related to cryptocurrency will be regulated. It is to be hoped that in the nearest time the Ministry of digital information will give out the detailed explanations concerning debatable norms.

We will
call you