Reform with the taste of uncertainty

In March this year, the European Community will receive a final decision on the copyright Directive, the draft of which in the context of the reform in the field of intellectual property was supported by representatives of the Council of the EU, the European Commission and the European Parliament in February.

Due to the ongoing debate on the balance of interests between the monopoly of intellectual property rights and human rights to access information in the world, the European Parliament has proposed the implementation of provisions relating to the protection of digital copyright.

The essence of the reform is to modernize the protection of digital copyright and provides for additional rights for electronic media in connection with the use of their publications. However, despite the fact that Europe has been discussing these changes for almost four years, some of the major corporations concerned in the field of information technology remain not too enthusiastic about the innovations proposed by the European Union.

In the context of signing the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, Ukraine should also formally consider the possibility of introducing relevant provisions of the Directive into national legislation.

Namely, the draft of the Directive provides for electronic media the right to receive remuneration if their materials re-use web applications or social networks for the automatic collection of messages. This means that online platforms such as Facebook or Google, in the long run, will receive additional liability in the form of payment for “news” organizations or editors for links to their materials or even to snippets. It is believed that the so-called “link tax” in the near future will create the preconditions for curtailing activities of small online platforms, which, in this case, will distribute fragments of news to the detriment.

In addition, privilege of rewarding was also gained by content owners and creators who, through the distribution of their songs or videos via online portals (e.g. YouTube), will be able to earn extra money.

Also, the envisaged enhancement of the content moderation rules will require the need to filter out protected content, in particular by preventing downloading infringing material.

Opponents of the Directive warn that the draft is a censorship tool, a filter for downloading content and contains provisions that threaten freedom of speech. Thus, the Directive will undoubtedly limit the development of small online platforms that do not have the resources to moderate the content, and therefore, they are not able to check the materials for compliance with the copyrights.

As for Ukraine, first of all, we do not have a direct obligation to implement the workouts of the European Parliament, but only to take into account the latter’s proposals as an additional element for improving domestic legislation in the field of intellectual property.

Secondly, according to Art. 10 of the Law of Ukraine “On Copyright and Related Rights” daily news or current events that have the character of ordinary press information are not subject to copyright, and therefore not subject to legal protection. After all, any intellectual product may be the subject of copyright only when it has a creative character. And if it comes to the statement about the fact, then the creative component is absent.

It the meantime, Google has commented on the situation, writes The Verge. The company’s representatives believe that it will break the Internet, because in order to deduce the search for snippets of publications’ materials, it will be necessary to buy the rights to use them, because the law will give the media rights to license such usage.

Making predictions for the future is too early, but the ability to simply empty blocks on the search query is unlikely to satisfy the curiosity of the average user of social networks and online platforms.


You may like
A new law on virtual assets: the picture is formed, but without details. On September 8, 2021, the Verkhovna Rada has finally adopted the long-awaited law "On Virtual Assets", which clarified many ambiguous points. This is especially true for the status of cryptocurrency and the rules of its circulation in the country. Let`s take a closer look at novelties. An ambiguous term Let's start with what the legislator actually means by "virtual assets". There are the following features:  they are an intangible good (cannot be represented on tangible media)  fall under the list of objects of civil rights (that is, they can be owned and be disposed of)  represent an electronic form of a set of data (essentially, they are blocks of information put in order);  the existence and circulation of assets are due to software tools (specific electronic environment). From these features we can draw the following conclusion: virtual assets are not limited to cryptocurrency. Digital currency is part of the concept, but other instruments, such as tokens, NFTs, or even in-game items, fall under the definition. Actually, the actual existence of most digital products, having a certain value, is due to the software environment (ecosystem), either it is blockchain technology, a trading platform, or an online game server. It should be noted that the attempt to define virtual assets was already made in the adopted Law of Ukraine in counteracting money laundering. In this act, they understand it as digital means of payment, which goes against the new definition. As a result, there are now two different explanations for virtual assets, which causes significant confusion not only in regulation but also in interpretation. It is definitely necessary to expect clarifications from competent state bodies. Let's return to the new law. Its application covers legal relations in which the "Ukrainian element" is present:  provider or recipient of services represented in Ukraine;  an agreement according to which the turnover of virtual assets is carried out in accordance with Ukrainian legislation;  the acquirer of assets (or both counterparties) is a resident(s) of Ukraine. The law also introduces an interesting division of all virtual assets into two groups: secured and unsecured. Here again, there is a problem of interpretation. The first category includes products exchanged for (state) currency, the second category includes instruments that can be exchanged only for other digital assets. There is an alternative opinion: that the turnover of secured assets is supported by real goods (money or other property), while unsecured ones are not supported by anything. The latter interpretation is the most credible, as the new law stipulates that virtual assets are NOT means of payment. Moreover, they cannot be exchanged for real goods, be they property, services or money. This significantly narrows the potential for the use of virtual assets not only for commercial but also for civilian purposes. About obligatory licensing The new law states that in some cases, the use of virtual assets will require licensing. The 4 types of activity are mentioned:  storage and management of virtual assets (or its` keys)  servicing of exchange operations with virtual assets (both for other analogues and for real goods);  translation of digital assets;  any intermediary services. A list is quite impressive, but there are some important exclusions:  if your service works with cryptocurrency wallet (it means users can dispose of accumulations into cryptocurrency independently);  If your service works on smart contracts or decentralized protocol, based on which internal transfers are performed. As to intermediary services, everything is more compicated. Actually, any mediation is based on the public share offering. That is why it is subject to licensing. How to get a license? A company that wishes on legal grounds to engage in virtual assets must satisfy legislative requirements. The key role is played by the minimum amount of the statutory capital, which equals 1,19 million hryvnyas (for non-residents it is 5,95 million hryvnyas) in case of storage and administration. For other types of activity (trading, translation and mediation services) the minimum size of the statutory capital amounts to 595 thousand hryvnyas (for non-residents is 2,98 million hryvnyas). The order of the registration of license:  to compose an application and prepare documents.  to pay state fee (68-136 thousand hryvnyas for residents and 340-680 thousand hryvnyas is for non-residents).  to pend review of the request (30 days).  to get a license. The duration of the license is 1 year. No norms about the continuation of legal force of permission are set (we are expecting amendments or explanations from the Ministry of Digital transformation of Ukraine). Notably that non-residents must pay a far greater sum, than domestic companies. The Ukrainian legislator obviously encourages an internal market, getting rid of a strong foreign presence (that, in fact, coincide with modern politics of the state on the whole). Together with an application, the following documents must be prepared: The access code to the copy of the Statute of the company (or the foundation agreement) kept in an electronic file in the database of the Unified State Register of Enterprises and Organizations (USREO);  Funding sources of the statutory capital (where the money are taken from);  confirmation of the actual injection of money;  information about beneficiaries (special attention must be paid to business reputation);  the information about the director and founders;  the check about payment of state fee;  the internal regulations, in accordance with which ones, the privacy policy rules are regulated. In the terms of volume of necessary documentation of licensing is very alike with complete registration of legal entity. It is understood that the state wants the severe adjusting of activity of organizations that will engage in virtual assets. Is it already possible to get a license? The adoption of the law by the parliament is a significant step forward in adjusting and legal market of virtual assets creation in Ukraine. However, the new rules haven`t come into effect yet - their term of introduction depends on making amendments in the Internal Revenue Code. It is yet unknown, when a legislator will decide to enter the renewed system of taxation for such assets. Being "IT-hub" and territory, where cryptocurrency enjoys large popularity, the question of taxes must be decided maximally safely. Despite the presence of obvious gaps in interpretation, a new law on virtual assets gives the official narrative of what takes place and that, how the legal relationships related to cryptocurrency will be regulated. It is to be hoped that in the nearest time the Ministry of digital information will give out the detailed explanations concerning debatable norms.

We will
call you