Corporate agreement for IT-companies: why it’s worth the effort

Congratulations, together with friends/partners/brother you entered IT-business: clients stand in line, codes are written, designs are discussed and products are tested. In your head, there is a myriad of issues: hiring, loans, marketing and growth at last. On the waves of success, it is unlikely you think about corporate agreement. But you should: almost 62% of world start-ups fail because of founders’ conflicts. There is no such statistics in Ukraine, but averagely 52% of marriage couples divorce each year, – you know what point we are driving at.

If arguments over “I make decisions here”, “My embodiment is awesome, your idea is not worth a rush” or “I’m tired of cleaning up your mess and don’t want to see you ever again” came up to the point of no return, it is a corporate agreement, who will save your business.

In the Great Britain, they are being used for the companies and shareholders protection for more than 150 years. Finally in 2018, when Elon Musk colonizes Mars, artificial intellect has created own language and drones deliver pizza, corporate agreements are reasonably defined on the legislative level in Ukraine. We may discuss pros and cons of the new law “On limited liability companies and additional liability companies” (active from June 17, 2018) for a long while. But one of the unquestioned victories is the unprecedented flexibility in the issue of corporate agreements.

There is no obligation to conclude them, however the main aim of this instrument is the shareholders protection and the company’s consistency. The clear scenario what to do if “things go wrong” is a great alternative to disputes, long lasting court hearings, stratospheric expenses and broken relations.

When shareholders are in conflict, there is not much hope that articles of incorporation may deal with it. Often companies are registered with a one-size-fits-all statute: it’s time- and cost-efficiently. And not efficiently at all when troubles in the shareholders ranks are brewing. Actually, articles of association are not to fix such issues: this document defines company’s day-to-day business. Moreover: even the most faultless and well-laid-out statute may be changed on the 75% share capital holders will – a bit of bad news for minority stockholders.

The corporate agreement, on the other hand, assigns the relations among the company founders and future shareholders, minimizes hazards of conflicts. They act as an umbrella protecting company from shareholders personal problems, like divorce, leaving abroad, lengthy illness or simply wish to quit the business for no reason.

Another nuance: banks and other creditors while evaluating risks pay attention whether the company has the corporate agreement. In their eyes it confirms that you are reliable, farsighted and predictable – i.e. your serious attitude to business.

 

If love is gone, what shall we do?

Properly prepared corporate agreement helps to stay friends under any circumstances. If shareholder wants to leave the company and live to a ripe old age on some Tahiti island, his colleagues will not experience any inconveniences. His share will not fall into the wrong hands and the downshifter will not compete with them or disclose confidential information – remaining shareholders may sleep easily.

In the corporate agreement you are free to agree on a desirable scheme of the withdraw from the company. For instance, the share may be sold only to remaining shareholders at the previously defined price. In this case, they will be obliged to buy it. Shareholders have some financial problems at that time? – No big deal: in the corporate agreement, you may define a payment by instalments – even for 20 years. But it’s better to dig a hole carefully: curses come home to roost.

 

We will rock’n roll forever. Or not

Just think, what may happen if one of shareholders dies? Other will try to buy his share, but the heirs will not agree; the widow/widower will interfere in the company life, for instance through a proxy-director. Or vice versa: heirs will demand to buy their share, but the remaining shareholders will have no money. Or successors will sale their share to the first who comes along and you will have to split your cherished business with him.

The corporate agreement minimizes such risks. You may oblige all shareholders to insure their life. And should there happen the worst thing, the remaining shareholders will get a payout and buy the deceased’s share for those money. The company is unimpaired, heirs have their money and shareholders have no additional expanses: benefit! In other words: shareholder is dead, long live the shareholder!

 

Saving private Ryan

The minority shareholders’ nightmare: the general meeting increased the share capital 1000% over, their share became miserable and useless. In the corporate agreement you may foresee an efficient safeguard from the dilution of interest – an unanimous consent for some decisions, like share capital increase or making of an additional contribution to the capital.

Or let us assume, you’ve been removed from the company governing: directors are unaccountable, the vote at the general meeting doesn’t make a difference. The first idea spring on mind – to get a rid of this share. But other shareholders don’t have an opportunity (or desire) to purchase it. Penny stock in a tiny company is not a much tempting offer for potential buyers. There is the way out: bring other shareholders to purchase the share at a reasonable price. Of course, if you have envisaged it in the corporate agreement.

Another situation: you own 95% of shares and repugnant minority shareholder blocks some important transactions, for instance the company sale at extra high price. The problem will be fixed rapidly, if under the corporate agreement provisions the minority shareholder is obliged to vote for all decisions, proposed by his majority colleague.

 

Don’t you believe in the justice in the Ukrainian style?

And you don’t have to: in the corporate agreement you may agree on alternative ways to solve the conflicts. Negotiations, mediation, commercial arbitrage or toss a coin: chose your weapon.

 

If you read as far to this point, you should be already convinced that the corporate agreement is not a pure formality, but an efficient tool to protect your business. Now welcome for consultation, so as to evaluate all risks together with professionals, chose the most indolent scheme for the stalemate situation moving out and conclude a well-judged corporate agreement that will safeguard your serenity for many years.

Author
You may like
A new law on virtual assets: the picture is formed, but without details. On September 8, 2021, the Verkhovna Rada has finally adopted the long-awaited law "On Virtual Assets", which clarified many ambiguous points. This is especially true for the status of cryptocurrency and the rules of its circulation in the country. Let`s take a closer look at novelties. An ambiguous term Let's start with what the legislator actually means by "virtual assets". There are the following features:  they are an intangible good (cannot be represented on tangible media)  fall under the list of objects of civil rights (that is, they can be owned and be disposed of)  represent an electronic form of a set of data (essentially, they are blocks of information put in order);  the existence and circulation of assets are due to software tools (specific electronic environment). From these features we can draw the following conclusion: virtual assets are not limited to cryptocurrency. Digital currency is part of the concept, but other instruments, such as tokens, NFTs, or even in-game items, fall under the definition. Actually, the actual existence of most digital products, having a certain value, is due to the software environment (ecosystem), either it is blockchain technology, a trading platform, or an online game server. It should be noted that the attempt to define virtual assets was already made in the adopted Law of Ukraine in counteracting money laundering. In this act, they understand it as digital means of payment, which goes against the new definition. As a result, there are now two different explanations for virtual assets, which causes significant confusion not only in regulation but also in interpretation. It is definitely necessary to expect clarifications from competent state bodies. Let's return to the new law. Its application covers legal relations in which the "Ukrainian element" is present:  provider or recipient of services represented in Ukraine;  an agreement according to which the turnover of virtual assets is carried out in accordance with Ukrainian legislation;  the acquirer of assets (or both counterparties) is a resident(s) of Ukraine. The law also introduces an interesting division of all virtual assets into two groups: secured and unsecured. Here again, there is a problem of interpretation. The first category includes products exchanged for (state) currency, the second category includes instruments that can be exchanged only for other digital assets. There is an alternative opinion: that the turnover of secured assets is supported by real goods (money or other property), while unsecured ones are not supported by anything. The latter interpretation is the most credible, as the new law stipulates that virtual assets are NOT means of payment. Moreover, they cannot be exchanged for real goods, be they property, services or money. This significantly narrows the potential for the use of virtual assets not only for commercial but also for civilian purposes. About obligatory licensing The new law states that in some cases, the use of virtual assets will require licensing. The 4 types of activity are mentioned:  storage and management of virtual assets (or its` keys)  servicing of exchange operations with virtual assets (both for other analogues and for real goods);  translation of digital assets;  any intermediary services. A list is quite impressive, but there are some important exclusions:  if your service works with cryptocurrency wallet (it means users can dispose of accumulations into cryptocurrency independently);  If your service works on smart contracts or decentralized protocol, based on which internal transfers are performed. As to intermediary services, everything is more compicated. Actually, any mediation is based on the public share offering. That is why it is subject to licensing. How to get a license? A company that wishes on legal grounds to engage in virtual assets must satisfy legislative requirements. The key role is played by the minimum amount of the statutory capital, which equals 1,19 million hryvnyas (for non-residents it is 5,95 million hryvnyas) in case of storage and administration. For other types of activity (trading, translation and mediation services) the minimum size of the statutory capital amounts to 595 thousand hryvnyas (for non-residents is 2,98 million hryvnyas). The order of the registration of license:  to compose an application and prepare documents.  to pay state fee (68-136 thousand hryvnyas for residents and 340-680 thousand hryvnyas is for non-residents).  to pend review of the request (30 days).  to get a license. The duration of the license is 1 year. No norms about the continuation of legal force of permission are set (we are expecting amendments or explanations from the Ministry of Digital transformation of Ukraine). Notably that non-residents must pay a far greater sum, than domestic companies. The Ukrainian legislator obviously encourages an internal market, getting rid of a strong foreign presence (that, in fact, coincide with modern politics of the state on the whole). Together with an application, the following documents must be prepared: The access code to the copy of the Statute of the company (or the foundation agreement) kept in an electronic file in the database of the Unified State Register of Enterprises and Organizations (USREO);  Funding sources of the statutory capital (where the money are taken from);  confirmation of the actual injection of money;  information about beneficiaries (special attention must be paid to business reputation);  the information about the director and founders;  the check about payment of state fee;  the internal regulations, in accordance with which ones, the privacy policy rules are regulated. In the terms of volume of necessary documentation of licensing is very alike with complete registration of legal entity. It is understood that the state wants the severe adjusting of activity of organizations that will engage in virtual assets. Is it already possible to get a license? The adoption of the law by the parliament is a significant step forward in adjusting and legal market of virtual assets creation in Ukraine. However, the new rules haven`t come into effect yet - their term of introduction depends on making amendments in the Internal Revenue Code. It is yet unknown, when a legislator will decide to enter the renewed system of taxation for such assets. Being "IT-hub" and territory, where cryptocurrency enjoys large popularity, the question of taxes must be decided maximally safely. Despite the presence of obvious gaps in interpretation, a new law on virtual assets gives the official narrative of what takes place and that, how the legal relationships related to cryptocurrency will be regulated. It is to be hoped that in the nearest time the Ministry of digital information will give out the detailed explanations concerning debatable norms.
20/01/2022
We will
call you