RESPONSIBILITY FOR MIGRATION LEGISLATION VIOLATION BY FOREIGNERS

As a general rule states, foreigners and stateless persons may stay in Ukraine for no more than 90 days within 180 days period or within the period allowed by the visa. For violation of a foreigners’ stay in Ukraine the following types of punishment are provided: fine, entry ban, forced return, refusal to cross the border and forced expulsion, each of which has its own peculiarities.

The most common sanction for exceeding the period of stay in Ukraine is fine. A penalty in the form of a fine may also be imposed for residing without documents that entitle a foreigner to reside in Ukraine (for example, a temporary or permanent residence permit), or with invalid or expired documents. Foreigner`s employment without a special permit; absence of a registered place of residence are also grounds for bringing a person to administrative liability in the form of a fine.

The amount of the fine varies from 100 to 300 non-taxable minimum incomes (from 1700 to 5100 UAH). When imposing the fine, it is taken into account, for example, how many days the foreigner has exceeded the allowed period of stay, whether they were previously brought to administrative responsibility, etc. Moreover, failure to pay the said fine can be a reason for an entry ban for a 3 year period (for failure to comply with the decision of the state authorities authorized to impose administrative penalties).

An exhaustive list of grounds for imposing an entry ban is provided by the law:

– if it is necessary to ensure the national security of Ukraine or for the purposes of public order, public health, protection of the rights of people residing in Ukraine;

– submission of false information at the entrance, or forged, spoiled, inappropriate or someone else`s documents (passports, visas to Ukraine, etc.);

– violation of the border crossing rules at the border crossing point;

– violation of customs rules or sanitary standards;

– failure to comply with the lawful requirements of officials at the border;

– failure to comply with a court decision or decision of other authorized public authority while staying legally in Ukraine;

– entry into the occupied territories without special permission or in violation of the rules of such entry.

In consequence of one of these reasons, a three years entry ban may be imposed on a foreigner. The decision on entry ban can be made by the territorial bodies of the State Migration Service, the Security Service of Ukraine or the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine. It is important to keep in mind that a copy of the abovementioned decision shall be provided to the foreigner.

A person who has not complied with the aforesaid decision may be banned from entering Ukraine for up to 10 years.

A foreigner may also be banned from entering Ukraine in case of illegal crossing the border outside the border crossing points. In this case, the foreigner is obliged to leave Ukraine with a further 5 years entry ban.

Forced return is another measure of responsibility for the foreigner. The law contains a number of cases when a foreigner may be forcibly returned to the country of his/her origin. In particular: 1) if such person violates the Ukrainian legislation; or 2) if his/her actions threaten national security or public order; or 3) to ensure the protection of public health and the rights of Ukrainian citizens.

The decision on forced return, as well as the decision on entry ban, may be made by migration service, the Security Service of Ukraine or the border service. The decision shall specify the reasons for its adoption, the procedure of its appeal and the period within which the foreigner shall leave Ukraine (which shall not exceed 30 days from the date of such decision).

In such case, the visa is canceled and the documents that entitle a foreigner to reside legally in Ukraine (for example, a temporary residence permit) are withdrawn. The offender may also be banned from further entering Ukraine for a 3 year period.

However, please note that the simultaneous imposition of a three-year entry ban is an optional sanction (not obligatory) that may be applied when making a decision on forced return, provided there are legal grounds to do so.

It should be also noted that the decision on forced return and decision on entry ban can be appealed in the court.

The entry ban and the forced return of foreigners should not be equated with a refusal to cross the Ukrainian border. The decision on refusal to enter Ukraine is made if the foreigner did not comply with the conditions of crossing the border. The aforementioned decision is made at a border crossing point only if there are reasonable grounds for refusal, which must be specified in such a decision. For example, a foreigner does not have a valid passport or visa to enter Ukraine, or the person cannot confirm the purpose of the trip or prove the financial sufficiency, or there is a decision on the entry ban. The decision to refuse to cross the border takes effect upon its adoption. The person has the right to appeal such a decision.

It should also be added that refusal to cross the border is a one-time sanction. This means that when a foreigner eliminates the shortcomings that have led to such a refusal, he/she will be able to attempt to cross the Ukrainian border again.

In addition to the aforementioned decision, a visa for entry to Ukraine may be canceled if there are specific grounds, in particular: the existence of a decision on entry ban, or if there are good reasons to believe that such a visa was obtained illegally.

The most severe punishment for a foreigner is forced expulsion (Ukrainian legislation does not use the term “deportation”). As in the previous cases, territorial bodies of the migration service, Security Service of Ukraine and the border service have the right to decide on forced expulsion. However, the main difference is that such a decision can be made by the abovementioned state authorities only on the basis of an administrative court decision issued on the ground of their claim. Of course, the court’s decision on forced expulsion may be appealed.

The legal grounds for forcible expulsion of a foreigner are:

– if such person has not complied with the decision on forced return within a specified period without valid reasons;

– if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the foreigner may evade this decision.

It is important to add that such persons are banned from entering Ukraine for 5 years.

You may like
A new law on virtual assets: the picture is formed, but without details. On September 8, 2021, the Verkhovna Rada has finally adopted the long-awaited law "On Virtual Assets", which clarified many ambiguous points. This is especially true for the status of cryptocurrency and the rules of its circulation in the country. Let`s take a closer look at novelties. An ambiguous term Let's start with what the legislator actually means by "virtual assets". There are the following features:  they are an intangible good (cannot be represented on tangible media)  fall under the list of objects of civil rights (that is, they can be owned and be disposed of)  represent an electronic form of a set of data (essentially, they are blocks of information put in order);  the existence and circulation of assets are due to software tools (specific electronic environment). From these features we can draw the following conclusion: virtual assets are not limited to cryptocurrency. Digital currency is part of the concept, but other instruments, such as tokens, NFTs, or even in-game items, fall under the definition. Actually, the actual existence of most digital products, having a certain value, is due to the software environment (ecosystem), either it is blockchain technology, a trading platform, or an online game server. It should be noted that the attempt to define virtual assets was already made in the adopted Law of Ukraine in counteracting money laundering. In this act, they understand it as digital means of payment, which goes against the new definition. As a result, there are now two different explanations for virtual assets, which causes significant confusion not only in regulation but also in interpretation. It is definitely necessary to expect clarifications from competent state bodies. Let's return to the new law. Its application covers legal relations in which the "Ukrainian element" is present:  provider or recipient of services represented in Ukraine;  an agreement according to which the turnover of virtual assets is carried out in accordance with Ukrainian legislation;  the acquirer of assets (or both counterparties) is a resident(s) of Ukraine. The law also introduces an interesting division of all virtual assets into two groups: secured and unsecured. Here again, there is a problem of interpretation. The first category includes products exchanged for (state) currency, the second category includes instruments that can be exchanged only for other digital assets. There is an alternative opinion: that the turnover of secured assets is supported by real goods (money or other property), while unsecured ones are not supported by anything. The latter interpretation is the most credible, as the new law stipulates that virtual assets are NOT means of payment. Moreover, they cannot be exchanged for real goods, be they property, services or money. This significantly narrows the potential for the use of virtual assets not only for commercial but also for civilian purposes. About obligatory licensing The new law states that in some cases, the use of virtual assets will require licensing. The 4 types of activity are mentioned:  storage and management of virtual assets (or its` keys)  servicing of exchange operations with virtual assets (both for other analogues and for real goods);  translation of digital assets;  any intermediary services. A list is quite impressive, but there are some important exclusions:  if your service works with cryptocurrency wallet (it means users can dispose of accumulations into cryptocurrency independently);  If your service works on smart contracts or decentralized protocol, based on which internal transfers are performed. As to intermediary services, everything is more compicated. Actually, any mediation is based on the public share offering. That is why it is subject to licensing. How to get a license? A company that wishes on legal grounds to engage in virtual assets must satisfy legislative requirements. The key role is played by the minimum amount of the statutory capital, which equals 1,19 million hryvnyas (for non-residents it is 5,95 million hryvnyas) in case of storage and administration. For other types of activity (trading, translation and mediation services) the minimum size of the statutory capital amounts to 595 thousand hryvnyas (for non-residents is 2,98 million hryvnyas). The order of the registration of license:  to compose an application and prepare documents.  to pay state fee (68-136 thousand hryvnyas for residents and 340-680 thousand hryvnyas is for non-residents).  to pend review of the request (30 days).  to get a license. The duration of the license is 1 year. No norms about the continuation of legal force of permission are set (we are expecting amendments or explanations from the Ministry of Digital transformation of Ukraine). Notably that non-residents must pay a far greater sum, than domestic companies. The Ukrainian legislator obviously encourages an internal market, getting rid of a strong foreign presence (that, in fact, coincide with modern politics of the state on the whole). Together with an application, the following documents must be prepared: The access code to the copy of the Statute of the company (or the foundation agreement) kept in an electronic file in the database of the Unified State Register of Enterprises and Organizations (USREO);  Funding sources of the statutory capital (where the money are taken from);  confirmation of the actual injection of money;  information about beneficiaries (special attention must be paid to business reputation);  the information about the director and founders;  the check about payment of state fee;  the internal regulations, in accordance with which ones, the privacy policy rules are regulated. In the terms of volume of necessary documentation of licensing is very alike with complete registration of legal entity. It is understood that the state wants the severe adjusting of activity of organizations that will engage in virtual assets. Is it already possible to get a license? The adoption of the law by the parliament is a significant step forward in adjusting and legal market of virtual assets creation in Ukraine. However, the new rules haven`t come into effect yet - their term of introduction depends on making amendments in the Internal Revenue Code. It is yet unknown, when a legislator will decide to enter the renewed system of taxation for such assets. Being "IT-hub" and territory, where cryptocurrency enjoys large popularity, the question of taxes must be decided maximally safely. Despite the presence of obvious gaps in interpretation, a new law on virtual assets gives the official narrative of what takes place and that, how the legal relationships related to cryptocurrency will be regulated. It is to be hoped that in the nearest time the Ministry of digital information will give out the detailed explanations concerning debatable norms.
20/01/2022
We will
call you