Ukraine has ratified the MLI convention: aggressive tax practices get ready to vanish

What is MLI and why so much noise? It’s no secret that most of the current double tax treaties are in line with the spirit of the free 1980s or 90s, when bank secrecy really existed, and bank accounts opened overnight.

Now they are called imperfect, as companies moving capital easily avoid not only double taxation, but also taxation at all. The result is annual tax losses in the amount of 100 to 240 billion US dollars (according to the OECD).

In order to combat tax base erosion and profit shifting, the OECD has developed a range of measures, including the neutralization of the effects of hybrid tax systems; development of rules for controlled foreign companies; compulsory disclosure; granting of benefits provided by the double tax treaties in inappropriate circumstances prevention.

One of these measures is the creation of a multilateral instrument for amending double taxation treaties. This tool is actually a MLI.

The uniqueness of MLI is that it is an alternative to individual review of conventions in “manual” mode – an insanely long and complicated procedure. The MLI Convention (“Multilateral Convention for the Implementation of Measures Relating to Tax Agreements, in order to counteract the dilution of the tax base and the elimination of taxable profits”) allows international treaties to be changed almost automatically.

In fact, MLI is a “perfect convention” in terms of combating harmful tax practices. The acceding countries may amend all or some of the existing agreements and select the list of articles to be accepted in the proposed by OECD version.

How it works: for example, on June 7, 2017 Israel along with 67 other countries signed the MLI Convention and at the same time published a list of 56 agreements, which seeks to change with the use of MLI. In this list, there are not only countries already joined the convention, but also those that have not yet expressed a position, including the United States. So, even though Israel’s MLI will come into force on January 1, 2019, the agreement between these two countries will not be changed automatically, at least while there is no US consent.


What is Ukraine’s position?

Ukraine joined the OECD’s enhanced cooperation program in 2017, committing itself to introduce a minimum standard for the Action Plan to Combat Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS): Action 5: “Countering harmful tax practices more effectively, taking into account transparency and substance”, Action 6 “Preventing the granting of treaty benefits in inappropriate circumstances”, Action 13 “Transfer pricing documentation and country-by-country reporting”, and Action 14 “Making dispute resolution mechanisms more effective”.

It is precisely for the implementation of Actions 6 and 14 that Ukraine has previously selected the following provisions of the MLI Convention:


  • Updating the preamble of tax agreements in terms of the purpose of the application;
  • prevention of unlawful application of transactions (the rule of the main purpose is introduced);
  • income from the alienation of shares in companies that own immovable property;
  • changing rules for the recognition of permanent establishments;
  • mutual agreement procedure.


At the moment Ukraine has declared an intention to change 77 existing agreements (in particular, with Cyprus, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the OAU). In order for the terms of the deal to change, the other party must also approve these provisions. You can follow the online process using the matrix:

For example, we can see how the agreements between Ukraine and Cyprus will change: both countries have jointly opted only for a new version of the “Prevention of Unlawful Application of Agreements” clause.  At the same time, Cyprus has not yet ratified the convention.



The civilized world has long been on the path to struggle with treaty shopping: the conventions are restated in such a way as to protect not from the avoidance of double taxation, but from aggressive tax practices that have become possible due to conventions imperfectness.

The global deoffshorization involves Ukraine also, though these processes are happening with typical delays. First of all, under the threat will be schemes, built on the principle of tax expediency. A real business that uses foreign elements for logistics, proximity to consumers and markets will not undergo significant changes.

It should be understood that the MLI will not change the provisions of the agreements by the magic wand: the MLI provisions will apply to non-resident income from January 1 of the year following the year when the MLI enters into force for both parties to the relevant Convention. Provisions on other taxes – after the expiration of the six-month period from the date of entry into force of the MLI for the last of the countries party to the relevant Convention. For Ukraine, the Convention will come into force on the first day of the month following the expiration of three calendar months, starting from the date of Ukraine’s handover to the OECD: under our estimates, not sooner the summer of 2019.

Business has time to review own tax structure. We recommend to plan in a long-term prospective: take into account not only the changes that have already come to Ukraine, but also those that are on time: the automatic exchange of tax information, the strengthening of requirements for controlled operations and a number of others. If briefly, we need get used to a new reality, in which the tax residence is equivalent to a physical one.


You may like
A new law on virtual assets: the picture is formed, but without details. On September 8, 2021, the Verkhovna Rada has finally adopted the long-awaited law "On Virtual Assets", which clarified many ambiguous points. This is especially true for the status of cryptocurrency and the rules of its circulation in the country. Let`s take a closer look at novelties. An ambiguous term Let's start with what the legislator actually means by "virtual assets". There are the following features:  they are an intangible good (cannot be represented on tangible media)  fall under the list of objects of civil rights (that is, they can be owned and be disposed of)  represent an electronic form of a set of data (essentially, they are blocks of information put in order);  the existence and circulation of assets are due to software tools (specific electronic environment). From these features we can draw the following conclusion: virtual assets are not limited to cryptocurrency. Digital currency is part of the concept, but other instruments, such as tokens, NFTs, or even in-game items, fall under the definition. Actually, the actual existence of most digital products, having a certain value, is due to the software environment (ecosystem), either it is blockchain technology, a trading platform, or an online game server. It should be noted that the attempt to define virtual assets was already made in the adopted Law of Ukraine in counteracting money laundering. In this act, they understand it as digital means of payment, which goes against the new definition. As a result, there are now two different explanations for virtual assets, which causes significant confusion not only in regulation but also in interpretation. It is definitely necessary to expect clarifications from competent state bodies. Let's return to the new law. Its application covers legal relations in which the "Ukrainian element" is present:  provider or recipient of services represented in Ukraine;  an agreement according to which the turnover of virtual assets is carried out in accordance with Ukrainian legislation;  the acquirer of assets (or both counterparties) is a resident(s) of Ukraine. The law also introduces an interesting division of all virtual assets into two groups: secured and unsecured. Here again, there is a problem of interpretation. The first category includes products exchanged for (state) currency, the second category includes instruments that can be exchanged only for other digital assets. There is an alternative opinion: that the turnover of secured assets is supported by real goods (money or other property), while unsecured ones are not supported by anything. The latter interpretation is the most credible, as the new law stipulates that virtual assets are NOT means of payment. Moreover, they cannot be exchanged for real goods, be they property, services or money. This significantly narrows the potential for the use of virtual assets not only for commercial but also for civilian purposes. About obligatory licensing The new law states that in some cases, the use of virtual assets will require licensing. The 4 types of activity are mentioned:  storage and management of virtual assets (or its` keys)  servicing of exchange operations with virtual assets (both for other analogues and for real goods);  translation of digital assets;  any intermediary services. A list is quite impressive, but there are some important exclusions:  if your service works with cryptocurrency wallet (it means users can dispose of accumulations into cryptocurrency independently);  If your service works on smart contracts or decentralized protocol, based on which internal transfers are performed. As to intermediary services, everything is more compicated. Actually, any mediation is based on the public share offering. That is why it is subject to licensing. How to get a license? A company that wishes on legal grounds to engage in virtual assets must satisfy legislative requirements. The key role is played by the minimum amount of the statutory capital, which equals 1,19 million hryvnyas (for non-residents it is 5,95 million hryvnyas) in case of storage and administration. For other types of activity (trading, translation and mediation services) the minimum size of the statutory capital amounts to 595 thousand hryvnyas (for non-residents is 2,98 million hryvnyas). The order of the registration of license:  to compose an application and prepare documents.  to pay state fee (68-136 thousand hryvnyas for residents and 340-680 thousand hryvnyas is for non-residents).  to pend review of the request (30 days).  to get a license. The duration of the license is 1 year. No norms about the continuation of legal force of permission are set (we are expecting amendments or explanations from the Ministry of Digital transformation of Ukraine). Notably that non-residents must pay a far greater sum, than domestic companies. The Ukrainian legislator obviously encourages an internal market, getting rid of a strong foreign presence (that, in fact, coincide with modern politics of the state on the whole). Together with an application, the following documents must be prepared: The access code to the copy of the Statute of the company (or the foundation agreement) kept in an electronic file in the database of the Unified State Register of Enterprises and Organizations (USREO);  Funding sources of the statutory capital (where the money are taken from);  confirmation of the actual injection of money;  information about beneficiaries (special attention must be paid to business reputation);  the information about the director and founders;  the check about payment of state fee;  the internal regulations, in accordance with which ones, the privacy policy rules are regulated. In the terms of volume of necessary documentation of licensing is very alike with complete registration of legal entity. It is understood that the state wants the severe adjusting of activity of organizations that will engage in virtual assets. Is it already possible to get a license? The adoption of the law by the parliament is a significant step forward in adjusting and legal market of virtual assets creation in Ukraine. However, the new rules haven`t come into effect yet - their term of introduction depends on making amendments in the Internal Revenue Code. It is yet unknown, when a legislator will decide to enter the renewed system of taxation for such assets. Being "IT-hub" and territory, where cryptocurrency enjoys large popularity, the question of taxes must be decided maximally safely. Despite the presence of obvious gaps in interpretation, a new law on virtual assets gives the official narrative of what takes place and that, how the legal relationships related to cryptocurrency will be regulated. It is to be hoped that in the nearest time the Ministry of digital information will give out the detailed explanations concerning debatable norms.

We will
call you